- Obama to use executive seat to push private companies onto solar
- ‘X-Men’ director Bryan Singer accused of sexually abusing a boy
- Tennessee ammunition site explodes, killing 1
- U.N.: Iran cuts stock closest to nuke-arms grade
- Oklahoma gay-marriage case before U.S. appeals court
- Times wins two awards from Society for Professional Journalists
- Marionville mayor ‘kind of agreed’ with Kansas City shooter’s views
- Rev. Al Sharpton’s Easter message: Politically ‘crucified’ Obama has risen again
- Supreme Court to weigh challenge to ban on campaign lies
- UNICEF launches ‘Mr. Poo’ mascot in India to curb public defecation
Women actually on the front lines may not happen
Will hinge on set of standards
The Pentagon’s lifting its ban on women in combat does not necessarily mean that female troops will ever fill the front-line roles held by men, according to analysts, advocates and veterans.
Restrictive performance standards and military chiefs seeking “critical mass” among female applicants for combat jobs could delay or even negate the military’s recent policy change, speakers said at symposium at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute in Washington.
Pentagon officials have said that performance standards for all military jobs — including 238,000 combat-related positions opened last month to female members of the armed forces — will become gender-neutral to allow men and women of similar abilities to do the same work.
But some observers and policymakers place too much emphasis on physical strength in talking about combat roles, said Air Force Maj. Mary Jennings Hegar, 36, a National Guard helicopter pilot.
“I just really think that they’re thinking of warfare as bayonets and hand-to-hand combat all the time,” said Maj. Hegar, who was awarded the Purple Heart for injuries she received when her chopper was shot down on a search-and-rescue mission with special forces in Afghanistan in 2009.
“The ability to maintain your judgment and sound decision-making in life-or-death situations” is more important than mere upper body strength, Maj. Hegar said.
However, defense analyst Michael O'Hanlon said that physical strength is a key component of combat that must not be taken lightly. He noted that the first two female volunteers at the Marine Corps’ all-male Infantry Officer Course at Quantico, Va., both dropped within the first four weeks of the three-month program.
“Some people would say, ‘Well, the Marines are just caught up in this macho-world where it’s all about upper body strength,’” said Mr. O'Hanlon, a scholar at the Brookings Institution. “There may be a little bit of that, but there’s also a reality that infantry forces still fight by walking through the terrain for five or 10 miles with a lot of stuff on their back, and then using that equipment once they get there, so it’s a legitimate question.”
Former Marine infantry officer Greg Jacob, who is the policy director at the Service Women’s Action Network, said he required female Marines to perform the same physical fitness tests as their male counterparts when he commanded an integrated training company.
“It was pretty ugly, I’m not going to lie,” Mr. Jacob said. But “lo and behold what happened was that they got better at pullups. And I had women who were knocking out 10 pullups, 11 pullups.”
The lesson he learned is that “if you set the bar really low, then you’re not going to get a real high-performing group,” he said.
Meanwhile, the Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman’s call for a significant number, or “critical mass,” of female service members to seek combat roles actually could hinder their entry into those jobs, advocates said.
“The issue there wouldn’t be privacy,” Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey said during a Jan. 24 news conference. “It would be, you know, where’s her ability to have upward mobility and compete for command if she’s one of one? So, we do have to work both the standards and the kind of the critical mass, if you will, to make this work.”
Retired Air Force Col. Martha McSally, the first American woman to fly in combat, dismissed the notion: “You don’t need women mentors for women. All of my mentors were men.”
“Anytime you’re talking that language, that you need women to ‘be with each other’ … that’s just the wrong climate to be setting from the leadership climate,” Col. McSally said. “Just the policy or the discussion of that creates resentment in the men, that women have to ‘be together’ in this time.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Kristina Wong is a national security reporter for The Washington Times, covering defense, foreign policy and intelligence affairs. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Despite Pentagon cuts and eye on Pacific, Air Force implored to save the 'Warthog'
- Pentagon welcomes budget deal but says more defense spending needed
- Rep. Hunter to Pentagon: Don't lower combat standards for women
- Scientists raise alarm over plan to destroy Syria's chemical weapons at sea
- Hagel renews Qatar defense pact despite differences over Iran, Syria
TWT Video Picks
By John R. Bolton
Reality calls for attaching Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- With pot and e-cigarettes, Big Tobacco is just waiting to inhale emerging markets
- FISHER: Shades of Berlin in the South China Sea
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- Removal of military gear limits options for U.S., NATO in Ukraine
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers 'more deadly than jihadists'
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.