2 NFL seasons since agreement, still no HGH tests

Issa and Cummings apparently disagree.

In December, their committee held a hearing at which medical experts testified that the current HGH test is reliable and that the union’s request for a new study is unnecessary. Neither the league nor union was invited to participate in that hearing; at the time, Issa and Cummings said they expected additional hearings.

“We are disappointed with the NFLPA’s remarkable recalcitrance, which has prevented meaningful progress on this issue,” they wrote in their recent letter to Smith. “We intend to take a more active role to determine whether the position you have taken _ that HGH is not a serious concern and that the test for HGH is unreliable _ is consistent with the beliefs of rank and file NFL players.”

Atallah questioned that premise.

“To us, there is no distinction between players and the union. … The reason we had HGH in our CBA is precisely because our players wanted us to start testing for it,” Atallah said. “We are not being recalcitrant for recalcitrance sake. We are merely following the direction of our player leadership.”

Wiggins and other players said no one can know for sure how much HGH use there is in the league until there is testing _ but that it’s important for the union’s concerns about the test to be answered.

“The union decides what is best for the players,” said Ravens nose tackle Ma’ake Kemoeatu, who said he would be willing to go to Capitol Hill.

“I feel like some guys are on HGH,” said 49ers offensive lineman Anthony Davis, who would rather not speak to Congress. “I personally don’t care if there is testing. It’s something they have to live with, knowing they cheated, and if they get (outplayed) while they’re on it, it’s a hit on their pride.”

___

Follow Howard Fendrich on Twitter at http://twitter.com/HowardFendrich

Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.