- The Washington Times - Sunday, May 18, 2014

Social conservatives say the Republican Party should deny Las Vegas’s bid to host its 2016 presidential convention after the Nevada Republican Party erased from its platform the pro-life and traditional-marriage language.

Tony Perkins, the head of the Family Research Council, said social conservatives were already wary of a Sin City convention, and the Republican National Committee could alienate a large part of its political base if it doesn’t take steps to distance itself from Nevada’s latest move.

“I think it is going to offend a large portion of Republican voters,” Mr. Perkins told The Washington Times, saying social conservatives made up about half of 2012 GOP primary voters and a quarter of the voters in the general election. “If they don’t want to win an election then they can continue to rip up these planks and build up a boardwalk to a permanent minority.”

Nevada Republicans stripped the abortion and marriage planks last month — just a week after the RNC had announced Las Vegas, the largest city in the state, was one of the finalists to host the 2016 convention.

Diana Orrick, a Nevada RNC member, said grumbling over the changes is “ridiculous.”

“I think it is an insult to try to punish us for reflecting the views of our Nevada Republicans,” Mrs. Orrick said. “I think that is a really childish stance to take.”

PHOTOS: Conservatives in Hollywood: Celebrities who lean right

Mrs. Orrick said the vast majority of Nevada Republicans think the government has no business in people’s personal lives and don’t think abortion and same-sex marriage should be a litmus test for Republicans.

“If you look at what is happening across the nation. I think a lot of Republicans are recognizing the social issues are destroying the Republican Party. They really are,” she said.

But the party continues to struggle with the divisive issues, and now they are casting a shadow over the RNC’s attempts to gin up excitement over the site selection process.

The Washington Times reported this month that the move came under fire from some Republicans, including Oklahoma Republican National Committee member Carolyn McLarty, a staunch opponent of abortion, who called the action an “attack on God and family.”

Ed Martin, chairman of the Missouri GOP and an RNC member, said that the move is a “big blow” to Las Vegas’s chances of hosting the party’s quadrennial made for television event.

“Nevada state GOP can consider how they want to describe themselves to the people of Nevada, Republicans or otherwise. But I don’t see how the Republican National Committee can consider going to Nevada for a national convention when they have made their position clearly in disagreement with the national party,” Mr. Martin said, adding that the issue is huge.

“The Republican Party does not continue if it becomes a party that dumps major planks of its platform. It just ends,” he said.

The RNC has signaled the platform changes won’t affect the party’s convention decisions.

“The convention is a business decision,” said Kirsten Kukowski, an RNC spokeswoman.

Reince Priebus, the RNC chairman, has sent a strong signal to social conservatives that the RNC is on their side early this year by delaying the start of the party’s annual winter meeting so he and other committee members can join the March for Life on the National Mall in Washington.

Gary L. Bauer, president of American Values, said that while a convention site is, in itself, a minor matter, it could hurt Republicans if it’s a signal that the party is abandoning social conservatism.

“It is a huge mistake for the GOP at any level to run away from its support for legal protections for unborn children and support for marriage as the union of a man and a woman,” Mr. Bauer said. “If Nevada is evidence of a trend, where the GOP holds its convention will be the least of its problems.”

Others, though, said that they have confidence in Mr. Priebus to work through these thorny issues.

Ralph Reed, head of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, said that thinks the Nevada platform changes are “ill-advised” and “not helpful,” but said he doesn’t think the RNC should write off Las Vegas because of it.

“I don’t think the Nevada GOP speaks for the national party,” Mr. Reed said.

“I think the message of the RNC is clear and unambiguous: That the Republican party is pro-life and a pro-marriage party,” Mr. Reed said, stressing that it is a national party, not a state party, convention. “I am not concerned that the Republican party is going to run its back on these issues.”

Copyright © 2016 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

blog comments powered by Disqus


Click to Read More

Click to Hide