- California’s Jerry Brown cites God, ‘religious call’ to embrace illegals
- Hamid Karzai’s cousin killed by suicide bomber at Eid al-Fitr party
- Obama thanks Muslims for ‘building the very fabric of our nation’
- Israel flattens home of top Hamas leader, takes out power plant
- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
Topic - Edwin Meese
Members of a special panel examining the FBI's counterterrorism efforts over the past decade say they will "push hard" for an answer to why the bureau has never revealed information about a human asset it reportedly had in direct contact with al Qaeda mastermind Osama bin Laden during the early 1990s.
My previous column focused on why the United States is no longer among the top 10 nations listed in the annual "Index of Economic Freedom." It's important to put this in a larger context and explain why it matters.
Mr. Meese explains in Human Events, "Mandatory information-sharing would afford enemies data that could be used to facilitate attacks.
Still, because the Constitution's meaning is knowable, as Reagan administration U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese has explained, the document merits a particular approach.