- The Washington Times - Monday, February 16, 2004

UMM-AL-FAHM, Israel — Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has won no friends in this sprawling Arab city with a proposal that the community and others like it might be ceded by Israel to a future Palestinian state.

Although Israeli Arabs of Umm-al-Fahm share much with their fellow Arabs in the neighboring West Bank, the former say they are more concerned about preserving the rights they enjoy as Israelis — including access to jobs, free speech, a democratic vote and a measure of political freedom.

“We have a saying here,” said Shoaa Saad, 22, “that the ‘evil’ of Israel is better than the ‘heaven’ of the West Bank.

“Here you can say whatever you like and do whatever you want — so long as you don’t touch the security of Israel. Over there, if you talk about [Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser] Arafat, they can arrest you and beat you up.”

Mr. Saad spoke while serving sweet tea and cakes in father Nabil’s family-run restaurant that, until the start of the Palestinian uprising in September 2000, catered equally to Arabs and Jews who wandered in from a nearby Israeli highway.

That business was jeopardized this month when a Sharon spokesman said the government — which has proposed unilaterally to draw a new border with the West Bank if there is no progress toward a negotiated peace — may cede some Israeli-Arab areas to Palestinian rule in exchange for Jewish settlements in the West Bank.

As many as 20 percent of Israeli citizens are ethnic Arabs, many of them concentrated in a so-called Arab Triangle of cities, towns and villages close to the West Bank.

The idea of ceding some of these population centers appeals to many Jewish Israelis, who fear that the Arabs, with their higher birthrate, eventually will outnumber the Jews in Israel. In 50 years, the Israeli-Arab population has increased from 160,000 to 1.2 million; there are 5 million Jews in Israel.

Palestinian political leaders were as quick to denounce the idea of a swap as were their Israeli-Arab counterparts. Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia said the scheme was “undebatable and unacceptable,” and senior Israeli-Arab legislator Ahmed Tibi called it a “racist project” aimed at protecting Israel’s Jewish majority.

In Umm-al-Fahm, many Arab Israelis see the proposal as part of a broader dilemma they face.

“The problem is we’re treated here as B-class citizens, but we’re seen [by West Bank Palestinians] as ‘almost Jews,’” said Issam Abu Allo, 29, one of three young Israeli-trained lawyers who discussed their situation over a late-night dinner at a pizza parlor.

“Mr. Sharon seems to want us to join an unknown state that doesn’t have a parliament, or a democracy, or even decent universities,” said Mr. Allo, who studied law and social anthropology at predominantly Jewish colleges in Haifa and Netanya.

“We have close family ties in the West Bank, but we prefer to demand our full rights inside Israel. International law says neither Sharon or Arafat is allowed to make exchanges against the population’s will.”

Before the intifada, or uprising, residents of Umm-al-Fahm readily found jobs in Israeli cities, mainly in the construction industry. But the strains between Jews and Arabs during the intifada have left a legacy of deep distrust.

Many Jews recall that a group of hard-line Islamists was elected to the city council and that local youths at one point had blockaded the adjacent highway, leading to violence in which three young men were fatally shot.

Often overlooked is that Israeli Arabs also have died in the bus bombings targeting Jews. At least two Israeli Arabs acted heroically to help thwart or end terror attacks, one of them suffering injuries in a suicide explosion after calling police with a cell phone to alert them to the danger.

“The last three years of the intifada have made our position much worse,” Mr. Allo said. “Israelis are suspicious of us now. Jobs are being closed to us. I was kept for two hours at the airport. I know a guy who was held several hours at the airport — just because his surname was Arafat.”

The lawyers agreed that “blowing up buses is not the way to bring peace,” but they also supported the Palestinian mantra that the attacks were the result of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Despite generally good experiences with Jewish classmates at Israeli colleges, the lawyers considered themselves culturally different and distant from the Jews.

The restaurant-owning Saad family expressed a far stronger affinity after years of trade with Jewish customers.

“We used to prefer Jewish customers because they really told us how good our food was and, unlike our Arab brothers, never argued over the price,” Mr. Saad said.

“Now we get one Jewish customer a week on average — and I can see how scared he is as he walks nervously in and looks all around. I hope the good situation we had before the intifada comes back, but I doubt it.”

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide