- The Washington Times - Thursday, January 29, 2004

President Bush’s budget next week will show the new prescription drug program costs $540 billion over 10 years, more than one-third higher than the $400 billion estimate Congress used in passing the bill in November.

“That really is a shocker,” said Robert L. Bixby, executive director of the budget watchdog Concord Coalition. “It’s a huge change. If a number like this had been floating around the Capitol last fall, it never would have passed.”

Congressional Republicans, meeting for a legislative retreat in Philadelphia yesterday, were briefed on budget numbers by administration officials. On Monday, Mr. Bush will send his fiscal 2005 budget to Congress, having pledged to limit nondefense discretionary spending increases to 1 percent.

Part of that increase will be in the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA), which first lady Laura Bush announced yesterday will get an $18 million boost, a 15 percent increase over the $122.5 million approved for fiscal year 2004.

But the Medicare number promises to be a bigger problem as the budget debate unfolds. Some Republicans in the House only voted for the bill after being promised the costs wouldn’t exceed $400 billion — something dozens of taxpayer-advocacy and policy-analysis groups said was inevitable.

“We told you so,” said Robert E. Moffit of the Heritage Foundation, who said he expects the estimate to go higher with every new projection. “None of this bad news goes away. It gets worse.”

The administration’s higher estimate of costs comes from its Office of Management and Budget (OMB) from Medicare’s actuaries. The lower estimate used by Congress last year came from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

Trent Duffy, a spokesman for the White House, said it is “the norm, not the exception” to have differences between OMB figures and CBO figures.

“This is ground-breaking legislation in a very unpredictable field, which is health care,” Mr. Duffy said. “There are a lot of moving parts and variables, and the experts do their best, but the one thing we know about projections is they are typically wrong.”

He said costs don’t always exceed projections. He said the changes to Medicare as part of the 1997 Balanced Budget Act actually produced more savings than projected.

But other times, Medicare cost projections have been wildly low. When the initial program, hospital insurance, was instituted in 1965, the projected cost in 1990 was $9 billion. The actual cost in 1990 was $67 billion — more than seven times the estimate.

Then, in 1987, Medicaid’s special hospitals subsidy was projected to cost $100 million per year by 1992, but the actual cost by then was $11 billion.

And when the 1988 Medicare Catastrophic Coverage Act was passed, the CBO put the five-year cost at $5.7 billion. Less than 12 months later, CBO estimated the price at $11.8 billion. Angry seniors protested the new law’s provisions and it was repealed in 1989.

Democrats had fought last year for a broader and more-expensive Medicare bill. But yesterday, they said the new cost estimates don’t mean the bill is better than expected.

“This new finding means an extra $49 billion in profits for drug companies, but the legislation still does nothing to reduce the exorbitant prices that drug companies charge,” said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat.

The Medicare numbers promise to complicate the pending budget debate, but Rep. Mike Pence, Indiana Republican and one of the conservatives who voted against the Medicare bill, said the bill should aid his cause.

“The silver lining of this disappointing news is it gives those of us fighting for a more frugal federal budget real ammunition,” he said.

“It’s not just conservatives. Even many moderates in the Republican conference are increasingly vocal about the need to return to our historic commitment for discipline in fiscal matters,” he said.

Mr. Duffy at the White House said the budget Mr. Bush is submitting still reduces the deficit in the long term, even with the higher Medicare estimate.

“The president’s budget will still show we can cut the deficit in half over five years if we restrain spending outside of homeland and national security and grow the economy.”

He also said Mr. Bush will push for cost-containments that were lacking in the bill he signed.

“It was the administration and this president that were pushing for greater cost control in this bill up until the final hours,” he said. “The president is committed to making sure cost controls are included in Medicare as we go forward. This is going to be a process.”

As for the NEA increase, the White House had Mrs. Bush make the announcement.

“American arts are a reflection of our history and the creativity of the human spirit,” Mrs. Bush said.

Even with the additional money, the agency still doesn’t match the $175 million it received in 1992.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide