- The Washington Times - Monday, August 1, 2005


President Bush’s proposal to create a national network of electronic health records could cost $156 billion to build and another $48 billion annually to operate, researchers said yesterday.

The health care industry itself, based on current estimates, will cover less than 20 percent of that amount.

“These findings suggest that policy initiatives are needed if we are to close this gap,” said a study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

The government doesn’t necessarily have to come up with the difference, the researchers said.

“I don’t see them as having to foot the bill,” said the lead author, Dr. Rainu Kaushal. “They can create the incentives, then the private sector can run with it.”

For example, the federal government could increase reimbursements for doctors who use electronic record keeping for their Medicare and Medicaid patients. That could prompt smaller physician groups to make the sizable investment that is often required for computer systems.

In recent years, many in the health care industry have already made the transition from record-keeping systems based on paper files to ones based on computers. Authorities say the new electronic systems save lives and money.

Members of Congress and the Bush administration, urged on by the health care sector, want to hasten that transition. So, researchers tried to project how much it would cost. Their work was jointly funded by the Commonwealth Fund and the Harvard Interfaculty Program for Health Systems Improvement.

“We know it’s expensive,” said Dr. David Brailer, appointed by Mr. Bush to coordinate the government’s efforts for improved health-information technology.

“We know it’s in the billions of dollars, perhaps in the tens of billions of dollars, and possibly even the hundreds of billions,” Dr. Brailer said. “But the principal question is not how much it is. It’s how do we create incentives to involve the private sector and prevent the federal government from financing it all. We want it to be market-driven.”

The United Kingdom has allocated about $14 billion to build a health-information network. Canada has invested about $1.2 billion — an amount the researchers said likely would have to be increased.

Because the United States may make a sizable investment, researchers sought to flesh out the structure of a model system, as well as its costs.

A major barrier to widespread implementation of a health-information network is that costs are incurred by a few, but the benefits are spread out to the many.

“Institutions tend to invest in areas with direct financial benefits to themselves, such as new equipment or facilities,” the authors of the report said. “It seems unlikely that the private sector will move forward rapidly to adopt [information technology] without public-sector investments or incentives.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide