- The Washington Times - Monday, August 15, 2005


The Navy, seeking a greater role as the United States wages wars far inland, is pushing an expensive, experimental destroyer it says will be able to hit targets from offshore positions.

The Navy is trying to improve its ability to conduct fire support — using heavy guns to assist Marines or soldiers ashore, much like land-based artillery does. The frequency of such naval fire support missions have declined during conflicts of the past half-century.

The proposed destroyer, called the DD(X), would fill a gap opened with the removal from service of the last battleships more than a decade ago, Navy officials contend. But the DD(X) has its critics, who say the Navy is betting on technologies that aren’t fully developed and argue the ship is too expensive.

The first DD(X) is projected to cost $3.3 billion, but sister ships would be cheaper, the Navy says. Since 2004, however, the Navy’s estimated costs per ship have gone up almost 50 percent for ships built after the first of their class, the Congressional Research Service says.

One proposal before Congress would cap the price per ship at $1.7 billion, forcing the Navy to redesign the DD(X) to something smaller and probably less capable.

The Navy also has reduced the number it wants to buy, from between 16 to 24 down to between eight and 12.

One group wants to see the World War II-era battleships USS Iowa and USS Wisconsin make a comeback, arguing their ability to bombard targets inland with their massive 16-inch guns is unmatched in the fleet. The vessels are inactive but could be returned to service with sufficient investment.

But Navy officials say they don’t want the battleships returned to active duty, and there are proposals in Congress to turn them into museums.

Current cruisers and destroyers mount 5-inch guns with a range of about 15 miles. The guns of the Iowa and Wisconsin can hit targets 30 miles distant with unguided shells carrying 1,900 pounds of high explosives.

The Navy says the guns of the DD(X) would far exceed the capabilities of those on the battleships and the current fleet.

The ship would carry two 155 mm guns that fire rocket-propelled rounds. Current test versions of the gun have hit targets 68 miles away. The Navy hopes to reach 96 miles.

Where the battleships fire unguided shells and destroy targets though massed firepower, rounds from the guns of the DD(X) will be guided by satellite positioning data, like many modern aircraft bombs and missiles, and be far more precise.

The first DD(X) isn’t expected to join the fleet until 2013 or so, presuming it continues to receive funding.

Many of those who are pushing the return of the battleships as an alternative to the DD(X) are members of the United States Naval Fire Support Association, a group of retired military and security officials who say the absence of battleships exposes ground troops to significant risks.

“The highly effective and versatile battleships are an incredible bargain and should be readied for rapid reactivation, instead of being turned into museums,” said William L. Stearman, a Navy veteran and the group’s executive director. “Our constantly dwindling fleet could use their massive infusion of firepower and their commanding presence.”

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide