- The Washington Times - Friday, June 17, 2005

Experienced parents will tell you that if you can get your kids through the teen years, they likely will be just fine as adults. That’s because teens face many of the temptations adults do but without the experience to appreciate the consequences of their decisions.

But what if we could somehow transfer some of that experience to teens? What if we could equip them with the information, courage and responsibility they need to say no to sex, smoking, drinking and drug abuse?

It’s a question that’s received a fair amount of study, and we’ve begun to find some approaches that work. One is to take on the issue directly with teens through what are known as abstinence-education programs. Among the most effective of these, according to a recent study by Dr. Robert Lerner published in the Institute for Youth Development’s peer-reviewed journal Adolescent & Family Health, is the Best Friends program.

Dr. Lerner’s study found students in Best Friends are:

• Six-and-a-half times more likely to remain sexually abstinent.

• Nearly twice as likely to abstain from drinking alcohol.

• Eight times more likely to abstain from drug use.

• More than twice as likely to refrain from smoking.

Looked at another way, girls who took part in Best Friends had:

c A 52 percent reduced likelihood they would smoke.

• A 90 percent reduced likelihood they would use drugs.

• A 60 percent reduced likelihood they would drink alcohol.

• An 80 percent reduced likelihood they would have sex.

One would think such numbers would cause lawmakers to rethink how government deals with destructive teen behavior. One would be wrong.

Despite overwhelming evidence kids are receptive to an abstinence-only approach and that increased abstinence-only education are largely responsible for a drop of 8 percentage points (from 54 percent to 46 percent) since 1991 in high-schoolers who have had sex, the government continues spending $12 on “safe sex” and contraception promotion for every $1 it spends on abstinence.

This doesn’t stop groups such as the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS) and Advocates for Youth from trying to eliminate abstinence programs and replace them with “comprehensive” sex education. These “comprehensive” programs are often misleadingly labeled “abstinence-plus” and falsely claim to forge a middle ground between abstinence and “safe sex” education. In reality, these programs are virtually all “plus” and no abstinence.

Analysis of “comprehensive” sex-ed programs reveals these curricula contain little if any meaningful abstinence information. On average, these curricula devote about 4 percent of their content to abstinence and the rest to such enlightening activities as “condom races,” in which teams of teens race to see who can get a condom on a cucumber the fastest.

They explore “alternatives” to intercourse, such as sensual feeding, showering together and other activities that seem highly unlikely to discourage kids from having sex.

In fact, out of 942 total pages of curriculum text reviewed from nine different “comprehensive” sex-ed curricula, not a single sentence was found urging teens to abstain from sexual activity until they graduated from high school. The overwhelming focus of these curricula (28 percent of content) is devoted to promoting contraception among teens.

Sadly, these programs have friends in high places. Opponents in Congress continue trying to introduce legislation to abolish federal abstinence education assistance. A proposal by Sen. Max Baucus, Montana Democrat, would take federal funds devoted to teaching abstinence and turn them over to state public health bureaucracies to spend as they wish.

Given the fact such bureaucracies, through the encouragement of federal funding, have been wedded to the “safe sex” approach for decades and fiercely oppose teaching abstinence, such a proposal would effectively abolish federal abstinence-education programs. Meanwhile, federal support for “safe sex” and contraception promotion would continue, unchecked.

Opponents of abstinence education will keep trying to eliminate it from America’s schools. But they have a tough pitch to make: Parents overwhelmingly support the abstinence message. Students want to hear it. The evidence of abstinence programs’ effectiveness is increasing. And the Best Friends program provides one more argument for abstinence education.

Melissa Pardue is a policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide