- The Washington Times - Wednesday, November 9, 2005

The recent announcement by Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania Republican, postponing confirmation hearings on Judge Samuel Alito until January, was only the latest in a series of painful examples of what happens when Senate Republicans wimp out.

Mr. Specter did not wimp out. The Senate Republican “leadership” wimped out when they made him chairman of the Judiciary Committee after he fired a shot across the bow of his own president, right after the election, publicly warning President Bush not to nominate anyone to the Supreme Court who would stir up controversy in the Senate.

That was the time to replace Mr. Specter with a chairman who would support, or at least not sabotage, the president’s attempt to put the kind of people on the courts he pledged to appoint in the election campaign. Instead, the Senate “leadership” accepted Mr. Specter’s assurances of cooperation.

Well, he is cooperating — with Democrats on his committee.

The delay in Judge Alito’s confirmation hearings gives Senate Democrats and all the liberal-left interest groups time to orchestrate a fear-and-smear campaign and raise the money to advertise those fears and smears, both directly and by organized protests that will get much free publicity in the liberal media.

There is another aspect to this. Liberal senators have every incentive to drag out the confirmation, regardless how the final vote turns out, because the longer they stall, the longer Sandra Day O’Connor remains on the Supreme Court. She is their kind of judge, who makes policy instead of applying the law.

There was a time when the nomination of someone with Judge Alito’s high qualifications to be on the Supreme Court would be confirmed by the Senate with little discussion and the confirmation reported with little media comment. But that was earlier, when common decency could be taken for granted.

Today, we can look for a Roman circus, complete with Christians thrown to the lions. Worse yet, the idea will be reinforced that a judge’s “views” on issues are important and need to be questioned at interminable length.

Actually, the only view that matters is a judge’s view of the role of a judge. If a judge sees his role as applying laws passed by other people, his personal views on issues are irrelevant.

Demands for “more information” have become part of this Roman circus, even when the senators themselves know the information they ask for cannot be released.

If a senator thinks the information available on any nominee is inadequate, all that senator need do is vote not to confirm. The power to vote yes or no does not include obstructing other senators from voting or dragging out the confirmation hearings into a media spectacle and a public humiliation.

Justice Clarence Thomas said it best during his confirmation hearings: “Confirm me if you want, don’t confirm me if you are so led, but let this process end.”

It needs to end for everybody — not just for this nominee or the next nominee but for the good of the country, so the best-qualified people are willing to go through the nomination process, without fear a lifetime’s reputation will be dragged through the mud.

Sen, Orrin Hatch, Utah Republican, has aptly said the coming battle over the nomination of Judge Alito will be “Armageddon.” It will be Armageddon for the Republican Party.

If the Republicans are unwilling to fight for the things they were elected to do, then some of the people who elected them may not vote for them the next time.

People who have for years not only voted for Republicans, but donated time and money to the Republican Party, who have volunteered to stuff envelopes, man the phones and walk the precincts to get out the vote on cold election nights, deserve something better than senators who wimp out at crunch time.

If the fate of the legal system in this country is not enough incentive for Senate Republicans to show some backbone, maybe concern for their own re-election will be.

Thomas Sowell is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide