- The Washington Times - Sunday, January 1, 2006

The White House is working this week on President Bush’s 2006 legislative agenda, though most of his major recommendations will be last year’s leftovers.

That’s because a divided Congress, marked by post-election bickering at its worst, couldn’t agree on some of Mr. Bush’s most ambitious proposals: Social Security and immigration reform, making his tax cuts permanent, extending the Patriot Act’s antiterrorist provisions another four years, and minuscule five-year budget cuts to keep the deficit on a downward trajectory.

Congress did accomplish some important things last year, despite the political trench warfare of Senate Democrats, who used the filibuster to block votes they knew they could not win under majority rule.

The Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) gave the free-trade agenda a much-needed push. Confirming John Roberts as chief justice moved the Supreme Court in a more conservative direction.

Other preliminary votes suggested majority support for Mr. Bush’s remaining objectives, including an early Senate vote to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (blocked in the final days last month on parliamentary grounds), and House approval of Mr. Bush’s capital-gains and dividend tax cuts.

But it was a dismal legislative year overall that earned poor marks from voters, marred by numerous distractions: House Majority Leader Tom DeLay’s presumably temporary resignation under trumped-up charges of campaign money-laundering; the White House’s focus on the CIA leak investigation that turned out to be much less than it appeared; the catastrophic damage inflicted by Hurricane Katrina that led to gleeful finger-pointing by Democrats; and a furious Democratic offensive on the Iraq war against a White House that for months seemed to have lost its zest for political battle.

OK, that was last year and this is now. The White House has certainly regained the offensive on Iraq, as witness Bush’s 10-point surge in job approval polls. The economy is strong, with a well-timed Conference Board survey last week showing a sharp increase in consumer confidence going into the new year.

Gas prices have fallen. So have home prices, as the overheated housing boom cools somewhat. Even mortgage rates, defying all predictions, have declined in recent weeks, which is good news for homebuyers.

Now Mr. Bush has a chance to take advantage of this sunny window of opportunity to make the case for enacting the administration’s unfinished agenda and maybe win one or two new initiatives still on the drafting table.

Iraq and the war on terrorism remain at the top of his agenda and will loom over the year’s events. Visible success in Iraq will strengthen his hand in Congress and his party’s credibility on national security, too, as they face the midterm elections.

Certainly Social Security reform, which dominated last year’s domestic debate, is going nowhere for now, but that clears the deck for other doable legislation.

Making the tax cuts permanent is paramount. It is the signature economic issue of the Bush presidency, responsible for our 4 percent growth. If the lowered rates are allowed to expire at decade’s end, just about everyone’s taxes will increase.

Republicans are virtually united on this issue and there are a number of Democrats, especially in the Senate, who do not want to vote for higher taxes in an election year.

Broader tax reform proposed by last year’s presidential commission, being redrafted at the U.S. Treasury, is a far bigger challenge. But Mr. Bush loses nothing by putting it on his agenda, identifying his party with income tax simplification and pro-growth rate reductions. It is a populist issue to run on and use against Democrats, who define tax reform as raising rates.

Finally, control of spending and chipping away at the deficit is still an important issue to many Americans, particularly in the GOP’s base. The $39 billion House-passed budget-cutting bill won’t pass the Senate in its present form, but the votes are there for gradual year-by-year reductions in the rate of spending increases. Mr. Bush needs to make this a bigger issue than he has in the past.

Meanwhile, two sea-change reforms will occur this year no matter what happens to Mr. Bush’s agenda.

First, the Medicare prescription benefits program gets going in earnest, with a major government effort to make the available choices clearer to seniors. That’s will have a very positive effect on one of the nation’s pivotal voting blocs that could give the GOP the edge in November.

Second, Supreme Court nominee Samuel A. Alito Jr., will be confirmed, moving the court further to the right, just as Bush planned. If he accomplishes little else this year, that will stand as a groundbreaking change in the court’s makeup for many years to come.

Donald Lambro, chief political correspondent of The Washington Times, is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide