- The Washington Times - Saturday, January 14, 2006

Official Washington has the attention span of a fruit fly. A “crisis d’jour” momentarily captures the attention of the so-called mainstream media, politicians and government bureaucrats. For a few days — occasionally a few weeks — the potentates on the Potomac will focus on “the problem,” hold hearings, introduce some legislation, devise a way to spend more of our tax dollars, initiate an “investigation” — and move on when they are “shocked,” “stunned,” and/or “surprised” by the next catastrophe or scandal.

Like a pan of soup on a hot stove, no one seems witting, willing or able to turn down the heat until it boils over.

Bush administration officials and lawmakers, preoccupied with leak and lobbying investigations, the Alito confirmation hearings, a mining disaster and the war in Iraq seem oblivious to what is happening south of the Rio Grande. Without urgent attention from some astute officials in our capital, the Latin American pressure cooker won’t just boil over — it will explode.

Most Americans see the burgeoning crisis to our south as simply a problem of illegal immigration. Reflecting that sentiment, the U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation to strengthen border enforcement before going home for Christmas. This week, most Latin American diplomats lined up to condemn the proposal. Mexico’s Foreign Secretary Luis Ernesto Derbez called it “stupid and underhanded.” Few in Washington paid any attention.

In fact, the flow of illegals across our southern border will only worsen if Washington continues to ignore the tell-tale warnings coming from the region. The most recent “leading indicators” of political turmoil:

The Dec. 18 election of socialist-cocoa grower Evo Morales as president of Bolivia was hailed in the European and Latin press as a great victory for “democracy.” In fact, Mr. Morales’ political campaign closely paralleled the America-bashing tactics used so successfully by Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez.

Promising to become Washington’s “nightmare,” Mr. Morales is now on a global “victory lap” that began, appropriately, in Cuba. On arrival in Havana aboard one of Castro’s private aircraft, Mr. Morales told an obediently cheering crowd: “I dreamed of joining the anti-imperialist struggle of Fidel and the Cuban people.”

Mr. Morales, 46, then jaunted off to Caracas for a love fest with the equally militant Hugo Chavez who pledged to invest $30 million to develop Bolivia’s considerable natural gas reserves and strengthen socialist domestic programs. The Bolivian head of state then set out for Beijing where he stood beside communist-Chinese President Hu Jintao in the Great Hall of the People and described his hosts as the “political, ideological and programmatic ally of the Bolivian people.”

Mr. Morales pledged cooperation with Beijing, which wants access to the country’s gas reserves, making Bolivia the latest in a string of nations in our hemisphere to turn away from Washington and head East.

Not to be outshone by his pupil, Mr. Chavez made news. Making good on his promise to ship discounted home heating oil to “Americans made poor by Bush” — Venezuela’s state-owned oil company — Petroleos de Venezuela S.A. delivered another shipload of a promised 25-million gallons of fuel to New England. The gesture received far more publicity than his endorsement of Iran’s decision to resume refining nuclear material that could be used for weapons production.

Mr. Chavez, awash in American petrodollars, has not only sought closer relations with Tehran and Beijing but is actively supports any anti-U.S. movement he can find in the Southern Hemisphere — not a tough task in a region where 61 percent of the people harbor anti-American sentiment.

In Nicaragua, Mr. Chavez found a kindred spirit in ousted Marxist dictator Daniel Ortega. If the well-oiled Chavez money machine isn’t deterred, Caracas could buy the next president in Managua. Then expect the tsunami of economic and political refugees across our southern border to continue rising.

The “Chavez problem,” the Morales promise to promote cocoa harvesting, the growing Iranian and Chinese influence to our south, the potential collapse of democracy and free enterprise in Central America — all argue for immediate attention from Washington’s distracted policymakers.

None of these conditions is intractable — yet. By far, the easiest “fix” is to focus on the coming elections in Nicaragua — and help the real forces for democracy flourish in the elections this fall. It could prove the first step in reversing a decadelong decline in U.S. influence — and help prevent the “next crisis” from overwhelming our southern border.

Oliver North is a nationally syndicated columnist and the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide