- The Washington Times - Tuesday, January 31, 2006

The biggest surprise about the big win by the terrorist organization Hamas in last week’s Palestinian legislative elections is that so many people were surprised.

Worse than denial is denying you have been in denial. Despite the Hamas and Palestinian Authority charters calling for Israel’s destruction; unilateral concessions and actions by Israel; despite negotiated “land for peace” deals, which only Israel has kept; massive U.S. and European aid, much of it funneled into Swiss bank accounts under the regime of the late Yasser Arafat; pressure and cajoling and confidence-building measures, none of it mattered. Hamas won anyway.

Now comes more denial. One hears Westerners say things such as, “Hamas now must deliver because people are most concerned with jobs, running water and trash pickup so they will have to moderate their views.” There is talk of cutting off U.S. and Western European aid to the Palestinians because of the Hamas victory. Do people sincerely believe a religious mandate can be modified by economic threats, or that Hamas cannot get funding from others, like Iran?

The “Quartet,” comprised of the United Nations, European Union, Russian Federation and the United States, issued a statement mentioning the “aspirations for peace and statehood” of the Palestinian people. Expressing the obvious, the statement continued, “there is a fundamental contradiction between armed group and militia activities and the building of a democratic state.” If the Quartet had not been in the state of denial, it would have seen the contradiction of trying to make peace between Israel and people not interested in a “two-state solution,” but in a region without Israel.

Why should Hamas listen to the Quartet? The Quartet has repeatedly demanded that the Palestinian Authority disarm terrorist groups before negotiations proceed, but the terrorists have continued attacking Israeli civilians. Why shouldn’t they when it seems the strategy produces results for them?

Following the election, President Bush told a news conference: “I don’t see how you can be a partner in peace if you advocate the destruction of a country as part of your platform. And I know you can’t be a partner in peace … if your party has got an armed wing.”

The president, indeed the world, should have seen this coming. For years — from mosques throughout the region, to newspapers and television programs — the violent rhetoric against Israel, Jews and the West has not only been tolerated, but also promoted by states we claim areour “friends.”

We now say we will have nothing to do with Hamas. That will change. Eventually, we will deal with Hamas after they claim to have ended or modified their charter for Western consumption.

How does one modify a charter that is the will of “God”? A senior Hamas official, Mushir al-Masri, told the Associated Press recognizing Israel and negotiating with it are “not on our agenda.” Even if Hamas did negotiate with Israel, why would anyone believe it would live up to any promises it might make?

People who have tried to draw distinctions between the Palestinian Authority, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, Fatah and other groups have been in denial. They are all cut from the same terrorist cloth and all seek the same objectives despite occasional rhetoric to the contrary: a Palestine that doesn’t include Israel.

What else is one to make of a statement by Hamas leader Abdel Aziz Rantisi, in an interview with Al Jazeera, as reported in the Jerusalem Post on June 10, 2003: “By Allah, we will not leave one Jew in Palestine. We will fight them with all the strength we have. This is our land, not the Jews…. You will have no security except outside the homeland Palestine…. We have Allah on our side.”

Al Jazeera TV carried a speech by Mushir al-Masri at a Sept. 16 Gaza rally: “We have come here in multitudes to proclaim that Hirbiya and Ashkelon will be taken by the mujahideen … that weapons of the resistance that you see here will remain … so that we can liberate Palestine — all of Palestine — from the sea to the river, whether they like it or not.”

Google “Hamas Charter.” After reading it and the foregoing statements, only people who must be in extreme denial can believe they mean something other than what they say and do. And that condition can get a lot of innocent people killed.

Cal Thomas is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide