- The Washington Times - Wednesday, February 13, 2008


The Bush administration has instructed U.S. diplomats abroad to defend its decision to seek the death penalty for six Guantanamo Bay detainees accused in the September 11 terror attacks by recalling the executions of Nazi war criminals after World War II.

A four-page cable sent to U.S. embassies and obtained yesterday by the Associated Press says that execution as punishment for extreme violations of the laws of war is internationally accepted and points to the 1945-46 International Military Tribunals as an example. Twelve of Adolf Hitler’s senior aides were sentenced to death at the trials in Nuremberg, Germany, although not all were executed.

The unclassified cable was sent by the State Department to all U.S. diplomatic missions worldwide late Monday.

In it, the department advises American diplomats to refer to Nuremberg if asked by foreign governments or reporters about the legality of capital punishment in the September 11 cases.

“International humanitarian law contemplates the use of the death penalty for serious violations of the laws of war,” says the cable written by the office of the State Department’s legal adviser, John B. Bellinger III.

“The most serious war criminals sentenced at Nuremberg were executed for their actions,” it said.

The cable makes no link between the scale of the crimes perpetrated by the Nazis, but it makes clear that the U.S. administration sees Nuremberg as a historic precedent in asking for the September 11 defendants to be executed.

The decision to seek the death penalty for these defendants is likely to draw criticism from the international community. A number of countries, including U.S. allies, have said they would object to the use of capital punishment for their nationals held at the U.S. Naval Base Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The cable is written in a question-and-answer format in anticipation of inquiries that diplomats may get from foreigners about the Pentagon’s Monday announcement of the trial and charges.

“Posts are asked to draw from the points provided below in responding to foreign government and media requests regarding this announcement,” it says in a one-paragraph summary under the subject heading: “Q and A — Guantanamo Detainees Charged for 9/11.”

Much of the cable is taken up with descriptions of the defendants and the accusations against them as well as assurances they will receive fair trials.

The Nuremberg reference is in the response offered to the sample question: “Doesn’t the application of the death penalty to these defendants violate international law?”

The one-word answer provided before the explanation that invokes Nuremberg: “No.” The unprecedented proceeding will be the first capital trial under the terrorism-era U.S. military tribunal system.

Despite the confidence of military prosecutors, the case has been clouded by revelations that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the suspected mastermind of the attacks in which hijackers crashed planes into the World Trade Center towers in New York, the Pentagon and western Pennsylvania, was subjected to interrogation methods that some critics call torture.

The cable refers specifically to this and instructs diplomats to advise foreign governments that the tribunal will not accept evidence obtained through torture and that the defendants can raise objections to any statements they argue they made under coercion. Those decisions will be up to the judge, it says.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide