- The Washington Times - Sunday, July 11, 2010


Lady Gaga recently beat out President Obama in the number of Facebook “friends” she accumulated - 11.9 million for the chanteuse versus 10.4 million for the president. Indeed, social media now provide a gaudy new gauge of public favorability. Numbers fly fast and furious, the access and discovery process is instant and the protocols scanty. Inside the Beltway finds, for instance, that Sarah Palin has won over 1.8 million friends while Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. has around 240,000. And in the battle between former presidents, we discover that George W. Bush has 217,550 friends while Bill Clinton has 347,838.

But wait. Conservative hopeful Marco Rubio, running as a Republican for the U.S. Senate seat in Florida, is perhaps the first candidate in the 2010 campaign to do the math and proclaim strategic advantage of his Facebook standing. Mr. Rubio says he’s trounced rival Gov. Charlie Crist in the get-friends race, with nearly four times as many online buddies. Mr. Crist is not the only one who was vanquished, however.

Mr. Rubio has a total of 102,292 Facebook friends and counting - compared with 26,790 who signed on for Mr. Crist and 99,933 who “friended” the entire Democratic Party. Other comparative stats: 17,392 favor his Democratic rival Rep. Kendrick B. Meek and 442 like Senate hopeful Jeff Greene. And on the larger front, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has 22,235 pals while 10,926 have friended Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Mr. Rubio also topped the Daily Kos, with 5,228 friends.

“With his grass-roots momentum surging, Rubio currently has more Facebook friends than any other 2010 U.S. Senate candidate,” says his spokesman Alex Burgos.


The federal lawsuit against Arizona’s immigration law - which takes effect in 17 days - continues to grow in stature, with Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. leading the charge. Critics say the suit is just an Obama administration tactic to woo Hispanics. But there could be collateral damage.

Opinion polls reveal that a majority of Americans oppose the lawsuit, and many favor Arizona-style immigration legislation for their own states. Most recently, Gallup found that half of Americans overall oppose the lawsuit while a third favor it. Partisan sentiments abound: Eight out of 10 Republicans oppose the lawsuit, 56 percent of Democrats favor it.

“This means the Obama administration is sailing against the tide of public opinion in its efforts to block the law,” says Gallup director Frank Newport.

“Political implications of the lawsuit are difficult to predict with precision at this juncture. Republican leaders will hope that reaction against the lawsuit generates more support for GOP candidates running on an anti-administration platform, while Democrats may hope that the lawsuit solidifies support among Hispanic voters in key congressional districts and states with close Senate and gubernatorial races,” Mr. Newport says.


First insurgent, then maverick. Observers say Sen. John McCain is now seeking “tea party” credentials to counter rival J.D. Hayworth for the U.S. Senate seat in Arizona. It’s ironic, though. In 2008, it was a jaunty Mr. McCain who introduced America to running mate Sarah Palin, who has since evolved into a bona fide, straight-talking tea party goddess.

“When does being a maverick turn into a shameless flip-flopper? Pretty much about now,” says the Observer’s Paul Harris, who adds that Mr. McCain’s liberal attitudes toward immigration reform, which came to light several years ago, have not been forgotten.

“It is hard to imagine that he was once seen as a politician who stuck to his beliefs and always put a good policy ahead of self-interested politics,” Mr. Harris adds in the British newspaper.


“I don’t like political jokes. I’ve seen too many elected.”

- Bumper sticker spotted in Harrisburg, Pa.


The Big Man Upstairs has friends in Congress. Sixty-seven lawmakers, in fact, are urging the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold the constitutionality of the National Day of Prayer, and quash a federal district court in Wisconsin that ruled the event “violated the Establishment Clause.”

Republican Sens. Sam Brownback of Kansas, James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma, Mike Johanns of Nebraska and Roger Wicker of Mississippi are among those represented by an amicus brief filed by the American Center for Law and Justice, which asserts that the day has a “historic pedigree.” Republican Reps. J. Randy Forbes of Virginia, Michelle Bachmann of Minnesota, Roscoe G. Bartlett of Maryland and Steve King of Iowa are among the many on the House side.

“This is a case where the law and history are very clear in recognizing the fact that a day set aside to pray for our country is not only a time-honored tradition, but one that is consistent with the First Amendment,” said their chief counsel Jay Sekulow. “Many members of Congress understand that the National Day of Prayer is a constitutional reflection of our history - our heritage. This tradition is supported by Supreme Court precedent and numerous acts of Congress. The 7th Circuit has an important opportunity to correct this badly flawed lower court decision.”


c 15 percent of U.S. voters say President Obama is doing an “excellent” job handling economic issues.

c 21 percent rate his job performance on that issue as “good,” 13 percent say it is “fair.”

c 50 percent give Mr. Obama a “poor” review on the economy.

c 83 percent of Republicans and 56 percent of unaffiliated voters give him a “poor” review.

c 69 percent of Democrats say he is doing a “good” or “excellent” job.

Source: A Rasmussen Reports survey of 1,000 likely voters conducted July 6 and 7.

c Friendly reminders, rants and rejoinders to jharper@washington times.com.

• Jennifer Harper can be reached at jharper@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2023 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide