- The Washington Times - Thursday, October 4, 2012


Brace for impact: The peevish press seeks to persuade voters to forget Mitt Romney’s stark and sparkling victory over President Obama during their initial debate. The glow of Mr. Romney’s polished performance Wednesday is destined for a very short shelf life as journalists on gaffe patrol woo the public with fancy “fact” checking and anything remotely linked to the phrase “47 percent.” Seamus the dog may even re-appear. Mr. Obama’s re-election strategists, meanwhile, already are wallowing in tactics. Witness this headline posted at the campaign website within hours of the Denver encounter: Mitt Romney’s debate performance: ‘mostly fiction’.

There is turmoil in the once-calm Democratic waters, however. The Republican nominee has humiliated journalists and they now seek revenge, says Breitbart.com analyst John Nolte. “The real loser was a corrupt mainstream media that had just spent months desperately crafting a Mitt Romney that doesn’t exist — a Mitt Romney voters would not find acceptable as president Obama’s media palace guards have assured us that Romney can do nothing right and Obama can do nothing wrong. This carefully crafted media game-plan, coordinated openly with the Obama campaign, was meant to strip Romney of the single quality voters demand in a president, and that’s competence.”

That impression was vaporized for a time. But the political process is grinding forward, and change, but not necessarily hope, is afoot. Mr. Obama and Mr. Romney debate again on Oct. 16, though not in a hushed auditorium. Venue No. 2 is an informal town hall setting in Kentucky, before an audience of undecided voters selected by Gallup. The combatants will argue foreign and domestic issues, moderated by CNN’s Candy Crowley. And their postures for now? Ready to rumble.

“Victory is in sight,” insists Mr. Romney.

“When I got onto the stage, I met this very spirited fellow who claimed to be Mitt Romney,” Mr. Obama advised his own flock. “But he couldn’t have been Mitt Romney.”


“We didn’t see a debate. We saw two slightly differing versions of defending the Republican and Democrat status quo that has given us war after war after war, a $16 trillion debt, and a government that is the answer to everything,” declares Libertarian presidential hopeful Gary Johnson. “Nowhere was there a real plan for reducing government, balancing the budget any time in the foreseeable future, or a path that will actually put Americans back to work. Barack Obama and Mitt Romney are nibbling around the edges of the nation’s problems. We don’t have time to nibble — we need to devour them.”


Debate, what debate? No time to lose here. In the next 72 hours, President Obama will campaign in Virginia, Ohio and California; Mitt Romney will journey to Florida and Virginia, including an appearance at the Virginia Military Institute in Lexington. And the aforementioned Gary Johnson? He will be in Indiana and Ohio.


“Be thankful only one of them can win.”

(Bumper sticker in circulation during the Richard Nixon versus John F. Kennedy campaign, 1960.)


Well, at least someone’s watching. Planned for next Thursday, it’s “2012 Election Integrity Update,” called to parse out current legal battles over voter IDs, clean voter rolls, early voting, military voting rights, and the Department of Justice’s role in it all.

Doing the parsing: Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, American Spectator senior editor John Fund, Election Law Center Virginia founder J. Christian Adams, Heritage Foundation fellow Hans von Spakovsky, True Vote President Catherine Engelbrecht, and state Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, Pennsylvania Republican.

Watch the event live online at 12:30 p.m. EDT here: judicialwatch.org/live. Locally, the forum is free and open to the public; register by emailing [email protected]


“One in 6 registered voters (17 percent) say they will vote only for candidates for major office who share their views on abortion — as high a percentage as Gallup has seen in recent election years,” says Lydia Saad, an analyst for the pollster.

“The group breaks almost evenly between pro-life (9 percent) and pro-choice (7 percent) voters, with another 1 percent not able to place themselves in either category,” Ms. Saad continues, and she suggests that while the electoral impact of the abortion issue could be minimal, Mitt Romney could still benefit from that extra 2 percent on the pro-life side.

“Regardless, making obvious overtures to abortion issue-voters could hurt Romney and Barack Obama with the broader electorate that may want to see the candidates focusing more single-mindedly on the economy,” she adds.

“It could also backfire by activating abortion voters on the other side to turn out for the opponent. However, it is likely that both candidates are using micro-targeting to find and appeal to these voters as part of a comprehensive campaign strategy to maximize support wherever it exists.”


59 percent of seniors over 65 sought advice before signing up with Medicare.

55 percent say understanding Medicare is “difficult but manageable,” 25 percent say it is not at all difficult, 12 percent said it was very difficult to “impossible” to navigate without help.

39 percent say they were satisfied with Medicare coverage when they signed up, 16 percent wish they knew more about out-of-pocket expenses.

30 percent cite using their own preferred doctors and hospitals as the most important factor driving their coverage decisions.

18 percent cite the benefits, 15 percent out-of-pocket expenses, 10 percent deductibles or co-payments, 7 percent their premiums.

Source: An Extend Health survey of 516 seniors over 65 conducted Aug. 19 and 20 and released Thursday.

• Tipline always open at [email protected].

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide