- - Tuesday, December 16, 2014

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

The liberal news media have been gleefully reporting the GOP’s political quarrels for many years. That exaggerated storyline all but vanished last week, though, in the aftermath of the Democrats’ humiliating defeats in the midterm elections.

Democratic leaders and their rank and file were deeply divided over the budget deal worked out with House Republicans. The rift was among not only themselves but with President Obama, too, whom they bitterly blamed for their deep losses in Congress.

Democratic Party discipline has been eroding fast as a result of Mr. Obama’s growing unpopularity, but Democrats were deserting the president in droves last week. Word ran like wildfire through their ranks that from now on, it’s every Democrat for himself.

The party’s widening split wasn’t confined to Capitol Hill. It spread quickly to the presidential nominating battle, where liberals were repudiating Hillary Rodham Clinton and throwing their support to ultra-left-wing Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts.

The $1.1 trillion budget bill that passed late Friday night contained two provisions, engineered and pushed by Republicans, that were poison to the Democratic caucus.

The provisions included language that rolled back key parts of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2010 that excessively regulated Wall Street and the nation’s financial laws to the detriment of the economy. The deal also relaxes campaign contribution limits that will allow wealthy donors to contribute three times the present legal limit to the national political parties.

The omnibus budget bill, in which these provisions were buried, was worked out behind closed doors with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Mr. Obama not only decided to support it, but personally lobbied Democrats to send it to him for his signature to avoid yet another government shutdown on his watch.

However, Democratic divisions ran deep in the House, where Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi urged her members to oppose the bill and the second-ranking Democrat, Rep. Steny H. Hoyer of Maryland and others supported it.

In the end, 139 Democrats, out of 201 members, ignored Mr. Obama’s pleas for support and voted against the budget package, which passed by a narrow margin.

It sailed through the Senate on a bipartisan vote of 56-40, but not before a fiery speech by Ms. Warren, who called on party liberals to block the provisions to deregulate the Dodd-Frank bill and significantly enrich the Republicans’ campaign war chest for the 2016 elections.

“Enough is enough with Wall Street insiders getting key position after key position and the kind of cronyism we have seen in the executive branch,” she said. “Enough is enough with Citigroup passing eleventh-hour deregulatory provisions that nobody takes ownership over but that everybody comes to regret.”

Ms. Warren’s speech is resonating strongly throughout her party’s liberal ranks, triggering growing calls for her to run for president.

Last week, more than 300 former Obama campaign officials released a letter urging her to oppose Mrs. Clinton in the party primaries, declaring, “We want someone who will stand up for working families and take on the Wall Street banks and special interests that took down our economy.”

At the same time, the liberal online group MoveOn.org, a major force in the party, announced that it was pouring at least $1 million into its campaign to draft Ms. Warren.

While polls showed that Mrs. Clinton remains the Democrats’ choice for their nominee, she has come under increasing suspicion from Democrats for her cozy relationship with Wall Street tycoons and other powerful corporate interests.

Despite months of timid, vacuous speeches across the country, Mrs. Clinton has yet to spell out any economic agenda to deal with a long-underperforming economy, declining incomes and a struggling middle class that has been falling behind for the past six years.

More recently, she delayed a formal entry to the race, pushing off a public decision until the spring and fueling a variety of anti-Clinton narratives.

Privately, there was a growing buzz in liberal circles who caution that her husband, Bill Clinton — her chief campaign strategist — slashed capital gains tax rates and signed free trade agreements, acts that went against Democratic Party orthodoxy, and that she might do the same.

“What we saw over the last couple of days is an example of a debate that is probably going to go on for a while in the party,” said Democratic strategist Jim Manley, who was a high-level aide to Harry Reid.

Right now, that debate is picking up a head of steam that has triggered political tremors throughout a leaderless party that is now largely in ruins at the national and state levels. It is also fostering a potential groundswell for Ms. Warren to build upon and, quite possibly, to take hold of a party looking for a leader who can rekindle the Democrats’ liberal passions.

Ms. Warren, a former Harvard professor who is a freshman senator with no executive experience, is enjoying the calls for her to run and continues to make headlines in a party searching for a liberal leader who believes the answer to our troubles is all-out class warfare and a great deal more government than we have now.

Democrats face a much bigger political obstacle in the next election cycle. They gave us Mr. Obama, who has been an unmitigated disaster as president. Whoever becomes their nominee will be someone who cannot deny that they supported him and his policies for eight long, unbearable years.

Donald Lambro is a syndicated columnist and contributor to The Washington Times.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide