- The Washington Times - Tuesday, April 19, 2016

The House Select Investigative Panel on Infant Lives was established six months ago to gather cogent, factual information about abortion service providers and middlemen procurement organizations that sell fetal tissue for profit.

“This is about getting answers to questions about how we treat and protect life in this country,” said Energy and Commerce Committee Vice Chairman Marsha Blackburn at the time.

These days, the 14-member bipartisan panel has been busy reviewing exhibits, workflow graphics and pricing charts that are part of the business model for the “fetal tissue industry.”

They are ready to listen and to be heard. On Wednesday the panel will conduct a hearing titled “The Pricing of Fetal Tissue.” Republican Sens. Ben Sasse of Nebraska and Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire are among the eight witnesses scheduled to appear at the event that follows a Government Accountability Office decision earlier this month to investigate how taxpayer funding is specifically used by Planned Parenthood and other federally funded organizations that perform or promote abortion.

“Procurement technicians are trained to work with clinic staff to target women coming in for abortions based on gestational age. They are told to quickly obtain consent from women at one of the most vulnerable points in their lives, relying on consent forms that are misleading — at best — concerning the likelihood of ‘cures’ resulting from research using fresh baby organs,” says Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the pro-life Susan B. Anthony List.

“The procurement techs are promised bonuses for particular baby parts, with stomachs, bladders and lungs resulting in a higher per-item bonus than ears, kidneys or tongues. This barbarism degrades our nation and violates federal laws against such profiteering. We commend the Select Panel for its investigative work thus far and call on the Department of Justice to take immediate action,” Mrs. Dannenfelser adds.

Catherine Glenn Foster — a scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, a research arm of the pro-life group — will testify as an attorney on the federal statutes governing fetal tissue research. Yes, C-SPAN will be there at 10 a.m. EST.


The clock is ticking on President Obama’s time in office; the legacy quest is in motion. Mr. Obama has departed on a six-day journey to the Middle East and Europe to meet with the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Great Britain and Germany. The Republican National Committee is not impressed.

“Obama’s trip: Farewell to failed leadership: The Obama foreign policy began with an overseas apology tour, and concludes with an overseas damage control tour,” the organization noted in summary shortly after Mr. Obama departed from the South Lawn of the White House aboard his Marine One helicopter on Tuesday.

Showbiz still calls though. A special 360-degree camera had been set up in both the press briefing room and on the lawn to record video footage. Historic? No, it’s all for a video to be shown during the White House Correspondents Association’s annual dinner at month’s end. So says eagle-eyed John Bennett, a Roll Call reporter covering the big goodbye who happened to spot the “disc-shaped” camera and made an inquiry.


Talk radio host Michael Savage has revealed that listeners often ask him this question: “Who do you really fear most? The vast right-wing conspiracy or the vast left-wing conspiracy?”

His response, during a recent broadcast: “If you analyze both sides of the equation, you will come to see the right wing supports God, country, family, the military and has far higher moral standards than the left. The left operates specifically to undermine God, country, family and the military. The left uses the courts to undermine the popular will. What they cannot gain through the ballot box they gain through the gavel. And so, my friends, if God could vote, he would be a member of the vast right-wing conspiracy.”


Alas, many fear a divided Republican Party. A journalist now suggests five ways presidential front-runner Donald Trump can actually unite the fractious group, reconciling establishment insiders and grass-roots voters alike. The candidate should tone down “chest thumping,” writes Sean Braswell, a senior writer for the news site OZY. He also advises Mr. Trump to reach out to “vanquished foes” like Ben Carson and Gov. Chris Christie. And hints No. 3 and 4?

“When it comes to the increasingly contentious battle for delegates, and winning GOP hearts and minds more generally, the true war is going to be won in fits and starts, one person at a time. ‘That’s how you devour a whale,’ Frank Underwood reminds his chief of staff in “House of Cards,” ‘one bite at a time,’” Mr. Braswell continues, also noting that Mr. Trump should retire the “us-against-them” thinking and concentrate on the “real enemy” — the Democratic Party.

Lastly, the writer quotes Bruce Abramson, a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research.

“Donald Trump knows a thing or two about branding, but mostly within a narrow market segment. Luxury goods have edgier ads than mainstream consumer goods,” Mr. Abramson suggested. “Ferrari doesn’t care about offending a few people — what they want are passionate supporters within a specific niche. Trump’s candidacy has followed a similar strategy, but you can’t win a presidential election with a niche brand. And if Trump is going to successfully pursue a broad market branding strategy in the general election, then he will have to fly his flag below the flagship Republican brand that conservative voters have come to trust.”


78 percent of Americans do not enjoy posting items on the Internet just to “rile people up”; 82 percent of Republicans, 73 percent of independents and 70 percent of Democrats agree.

19 percent overall say they enjoy the practice; 15 percent of Republicans, 19 percent of independents and 21 percent of Democrats agree.

76 percent of Americans overall say they have not been “bullied” or harassed online; 73 percent of Republicans, 75 percent of independents and 70 percent of Democrats agree.

21 percent overall say they have experienced bullying online; 23 percent of Republicans, 21 percent of independents and 20 percent of Democrats agree.

41 percent overall say they would consider reporting such incidents to the police; 33 percent of Republicans, 41 percent of independents and 45 percent of Democrats agree.

Source: A YouGov poll of 1,000 U.S. adults conducted April 14-15.

Cranky outbursts, clever asides to [email protected]

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide