- - Thursday, January 17, 2019

The Cambridge English Dictionary defines blackmail as “the act of getting money from people or forcing them to do something by threatening to harm someone unless [they do] as you say.”

That sounds like what President Trump is doing to force Congress to hand over $5.7 billion so he can build his wall along 200 miles of our 2,000 mile border with Mexico.

The president has told House Democratic leaders that if they do not agree to give him this money, he will not sign the budget bill needed to keep many parts of the federal government running and pay their salaries.


TOP STORIES
Biden trolls Trump after Stone verdict: 'Zero criminal convictions' for Team Obama
Evangelist Franklin Graham calls impeachment hearing 'a day of shame for America'
ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos' Clinton conflicts resurface amid impeachment


Democrats, who have majority control of the House, where all federal funding originates, are flatly opposed to the wall, which they say is a wasteful, unneeded, frivolous political, boondoggle.

On Wednesday, the partial government shutdown went into its 26th day, the longest government shutdown in U.S. history, with neither side giving any substantive ground.



Thousands of federal workers have been furloughed, or are working without pay, about 800,000 employees in all, causing widespread financial hardships throughout the government.

Many federal workers haven’t enough to pay their rent, mortgage, grocery bills and other necessities. And critical government responsibilities are not being fulfilled: Tax refunds, airline safety, among many other federal services.

Then, when the outlook for any concessions appeared bleakest, Mr. Trump began to give a little ground, while House Speaker Nancy Pelosi decided that two could play at this game.

In a letter to Mr. Trump on Wednesday, Mrs. Pelosi suggested that it would be best to postpone the president’s State of the Union address because the shutdown had weakened security personnel resources needed for that event on Jan 29.

“Sadly, given the security concerns and unless government re-opens this week, I suggest that we work together to determine another suitable date after government has re-opened for this address or for you to consider delivering your State of the Union address in writing to the Congress on January 29,” she wrote.

Mrs. Pelosi pointedly noted that “it was my privilege as Speaker to invite you to deliver the State of the Union address,” underscoring that the president addresses Congress only by her invitation.

She reminded him that during “the 19th century and up until the presidency of Woodrow Wilson, these annual State of the Union messages were delivered to Congress in writing.”

And if Mr. Trump didn’t fully grasp her point, she added that “since the start of modern budgeting in Fiscal Year 1977, a State of the Union address has never been delivered during a government shutdown.”

Mrs. Pelosi’s timing was impeccable because it followed the Trump administration’s announcement Tuesday that it was calling back tens of thousands of government workers to handle key federal jobs, including tax refunds, airline flight safety, food and drug supply inspections.

In what amounted to an “Oops, we goofed” admission, Mr. Trump was calling back nearly 50,000 furloughed federal employees.

Had he thought through the damaging consequences of his government shutdown order? Did he listen to his White House advisers who told him that it would end up hurting him politically, and make him look like he didn’t know what he was doing?

At this writing, a lot of damage has been done to major government operations, people’s lives have been turned upside down, and nothing useful has been accomplished.

Mr. Trump met with Democratic leaders last week to work out a compromise, but when he asked Mrs. Pelosi if she would agree to building his wall, and she said “no,” he walked out of the room. So much for his supposed ability to cut deals.

Senate Appropriations Chairman Richard C. Shelby, Alabama Republican, said that nothing was going to change until both sides agreed to negotiate seriously. “Until that happens, the situation looks bleak,” he said.

Mr. Shelby noted that the impasse reminded him of the play “Waiting for Godot,” by Irish playwright Samuel Beckett, about two men waiting for Godot to show up, but in the end, he never does.

Hope of a quick compromise agreement seemed dim this week.

When reporters asked Sen. John Neely Kennedy, Louisiana Republican, if there was anything more that Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell could do to end the shutdown, he replied:

“Pray.”

• Donald Lambro is a syndicated columnist and contributor to The Washington Times.

Sign up for Daily Opinion Newsletter

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide