“The Defense Department must enable the highest level of competition for AI and other next-generation technologies,” Daniel N. Hoffman writes in an op-ed for The Washington Times. Such competition “attracts more entrants into the defense market, spurs innovation and reduces costs to taxpayers,” he writes, asserting that the department also “should not hesitate to allow higher profit margins if that creates greater incentives for research and development and reduces development time.
“Competitive market forces, not artificially low or noncompetitive profit margins, should drive the basis for negotiating price,” writes Mr. Hoffman, a retired CIA Clandestine Services officer and opinion contributor to Threat Status.
“The Defense Department should double down on investing in cutting-edge technology such as Project Maven by expanding funding for more world-class laboratories and research facilities and nurturing the workforce of U.S. scientists and engineers on whom the defense industrial base relies,” he writes. “With productive bipartisan oversight and budgeting from Congress, the Defense Department is poised to lead the U.S. to victory in the AI arms race.”