You are currently viewing the printable version of this entry, to return to the normal page, please click here.

Many question Michelle Obama's appearance at Oscars, including Iranian media

← return to Water Cooler

A sizable audience was plenty rattled When first lady Michelle Obama stepped forward in a glittering silver dress for the grand finale of the Academy Awards. Conservatives, not to mention other critics, questioned her insider status immediately via social media and pondered her politically tinged speech. They wondered why she was surrounded by a supporting cast of active duty military personnel in full dress uniforms.

“As if Hanoi Jane weren’t fuel enough. Oh my God - the Academy actually fans the fire by drafting first lady Michelle Obama to help present Best Picture from presumably the White House? So unnecessary and inappropriate to inject so much politics into the Oscars yet again,” said media and entertainment blogger Nikki Finke, a Hollywood confidante of the first order.

An online poll from Media Bistro, an insider site for Washington-based news media, revealed that 63 percent of the respondents felt Mrs. Obama’s appearance was “entirely inappropriate.”

Others went a step further.

“Iran’s semi-official Fars news agency Photoshopped pictures of Michelle Obama at the Oscars to conform to Iranian restrictions on images of the female body in the media,” reports the Daily Guardian.

“Fars, which is affiliated to the Islamic republic’s elite Revolutionary Guards, redesigned the US first lady’s dress so that it covered her chest and shoulders in a picture showing her announcing that Argo had won best picture, via a video link from the White House,” the news organization said. “Rules dictate that Iranian women shown on Iran’s state television should have a hijab that covers their hair, arms and legs.”

The Guardian added, “Fars was also infuriated by the Academy’s decision to honor Argo, which it described as an ‘anti-Iranian’ film produced by the ‘Zionist’ company Warner Bros - an objection echoed by many other state agencies.”

← return to Water Cooler

blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Illustration by Greg Groesch/The Washington Times

    LAMBRO: Skirting the lane-closure issue

  • Illustration by Linas Garsys/The Washington Times

    LYONS: Benghazi demands a select committee in Congress

  • Happening Now