- Israel hits symbols of Hamas rule; scores killed
- Mississippi abortion law can’t be enforced
- Teacher who survived Sandy Hook has book deal
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in case vs. ‘American Sniper’ author Chris Kyle
- Government OKs Arab-owned company to operate U.S. cargo port
- Defense lawyer: McDonnell’s wife had ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House unveils bill to speed deportations of illegal immigrant children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
LANDRITH: Van Jones’ campaign for election fraud
Silencing political opponents is tactic of Obama allies on radical left
Question of the Day
Throughout history, political extremists have attacked their opponents, seeking to silence and suppress those with whom they disagree. Some form of bullying is almost always their chief weapon. These extremists invariably try to undermine democracy itself and silence their opposition. This truth has been sadly evident in recent attacks by Van Jones and his group, Color of Change, on the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).
Mr. Jones is a former Obama administration official who resigned after it was revealed that he was a Sept. 11 truther who signed a letter demanding an investigation into what the Bush administration may have done that “deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war.” It was also revealed that Mr. Jones was an active and self-described communist and revolutionary. I do not make a habit of calling anyone a communist, but Mr. Jones has called himself a revolutionary and a communist. This may explain his disregard for the American values of free speech, and free and open elections.
ALEC has written model legislation on hundreds of topics - everything from tort reform to transparency in government. But the legislation that Mr. Jones has primarily railed against deals with voter integrity and preventing fraudulent ballots from being cast. Mr. Jones and, not coincidentally, the Obama administration both call voter integrity laws “voter suppression.” They argue that voters showing their identification at the polls is such an unfair and weighty burden that it suppresses the votes of minorities. Yet, majorities of every demographic group, including minorities, strongly support voter integrity laws. Virtually everyone understands that fraud in voting endangers and dilutes their vote.
The real issue for Mr. Jones and his Color of Change organization is making sure that political operatives are left free to cast fraudulent ballots in elections to benefit Mr. Obama’s re-election, help Nancy Pelosi regain the speaker’s gavel and maintain Harry Reid’s grip on power in the Senate.
Recently, Mr. Jones and his organization have cynically tried to blame ALEC for the tragic shooting death of Trayvon Martin. This is not because ALEC is actually responsible, but rather because it helps Mr. Jones discredit and silence ALEC and stop its efforts to pass voter integrity measures. Nonetheless, Mr. Jones shamelessly asserts ALEC is to blame for Trayvon’s death because ALEC supports model legislation that allows law-abiding citizens to protect themselves from violent aggressors. But the law does not give the right of one citizen to simply shoot another citizen. That is why we have a legal system. The truth will come out.
But Mr. Jones isn’t interested in the truth. He is simply playing the cynical game of seizing upon this tragedy for political gain, calling it a “perfect storm,” again proving that the extreme left will “never let a serious crisis go to waste.”
Mr. Jones has orchestrated an elaborate offensive, hoping to defund and silence ALEC by bulldozing its donors into canceling their support. Already, Pepsi, Intuit, McDonald’s, Coke and Kraft have withdrawn their support from ALEC. Mr. Jones claims he will continue to target other supporters such as Wal-Mart, State Farm and others.
Mr. Jones‘ tactics are the equivalent of a high school coach hiring someone to sabotage the other team’s bus to prevent them from showing up for the scheduled contest. If the other team somehow manages to arrive for the game, the dishonest coach pays off the referees to ensure a victory despite what actually happens on the field. Such an action would reveal that the coach does not believe his team can win by outperforming the other team. It would suggest the coach expects to lose a fair competition, so he underhandedly attempts to prevent his opponent from showing up for the contest. And if the opponent does show up, he corrupts the system so he can steal the win anyhow. This is what Mr. Jones is trying to do.
America has always been premised on the idea that more speech and debate are desirable and lead to better results because the best ideas rise to the top. Likewise, America’s system of representative democracy requires honest and fair elections. But if Van Jones gets his way, those who disagree with him will be silenced and our elections corrupted and stolen. This reveals the poverty of his ideas and the frailty of his arguments. More importantly, it explains why every American should oppose his efforts.
George Landrith is president of Frontiers of Freedom.
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Obama: 'Not a new Cold War,' but new Russia sanctions announced
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- HURT: Impeaching Obama is a losing strategy for the GOP
- GOP Senate candidate: Obama needs to visit Central America
- Obama's brother wears Hamas scarf bearing anti-Israel slogans in photo
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Kerry's credibility questioned as fighting in Gaza rages