- No mas: Principal bans Spanish language in intercom announcement
- Hacking software could put ‘zombie drone army’ in user’s hands
- Support for stricter gun laws drops: poll
- 10 whales dead, 41 others stranded in Everglades
- John Boehner faces bipartisan pressure to allow gay-rights vote
- Martin Bashir resigns from MSNBC over ‘ill-judged’ comments about Sarah Palin
- Rep. Duncan Hunter: While Obama prays for Iranian change, U.S. should ready its nukes
- Best company ever? Veteran Beer Co. exists to employ vets, provide quality beer
- Iran official: Sanctions ‘utterly failed’ to stop nuclear program
- ‘Black Santa’ display at IU sparks student outrage
U.S. readies for possible air strikes on Syria
The United States is ready to strike Syria's air force and suspected munition sites to blunt the regime’s ability to fight off the various rebel groups fighting to bring down President Bashar al Assad.
To date, there has been no major shifting of U.S. forces toward the region, an indication the Pentagon and White House are looking at limited strikes by cruise missiles and not an all-out air war such as the ones launched in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.
The Navy has bolstered the number of missile-carrying destroyers and cruisers in the Eastern Mediterranean. Technicians can program the rockets with the global-positioning system to precisely hit collections of helicopters or airplanes, a munitions dump suspected of holding chemical weapons, and command centers that might be occupied by senior generals, or Mr. Assad himself.
Libya, the scene of the most recent American major air campaign, saw hundreds of NATO aircraft, bolstered by ship-to-shore missiles, strike a wide array of military targets, including ones thought to hold Libya dictator Moammar Gadhafi.
Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has expressed deep reservations about any direct military action in Syria, where the number of rebel groups exceed 50 and al Qaeda is growing in influence.
This suggests that the campaign would be highly restricted, if President Obama does approve strikes as a response to Assad’s suspected use of chemical weapons against civilians last week.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Rules of engagement bind U.S. troops' actions in Afghanistan
- Navy SEALs cite shabby treatment as Obama administration helps Hollywood instead
- Delta Force Marine awarded Navy Cross for fight at CIA annex in Benghazi
- Army intelligence says it needs good cloud computing to save lives in Afghanistan
- Missiles flow into Syria, risk falling into hands of al Qaeda
- Apple wins facial recognition patent for iPhone 6
- First Dog Sunny knocks down Ashtyn Gardner; Michelle Obama yanks leash
- Hola: Boehner prepares to push amnesty bill through House
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- MILLER: Obamas EPA closing smelter will not affect ammunition supply
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
- U.S. drops 2,000 mice on Guam by parachute to kill snakes
- HURT: Postal Service misses address by a whole continent
- Inside the Ring: China targeting U.S. spy flights
- HARPER: 'Knockout game' not a myth to liberal Sharpton
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
A libertarian look at breaking news and political trends by author Tom Mullen.
A stat-head’s outlook, direct from his worn in couch cushion.
Playing Through covers the world of PGA golf, as well as tips your the average golfer to play better.