- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
Syrian state media call Obama’s move a ‘retreat’
A Syrian state-run newspaper published a front-page article Sunday declaring President Obama’s decision to wait for congressional authorization to launch any military strikes a signal of “retreat” by the United States.
After more than a week of deliberation, Mr. Obama said Saturday that he will wait on Congress to punish Syria for a chemical weapons attack, even though he said a military strike is needed. Mr. Obama said the country will be stronger by taking that course, but the Al-Thawra daily claimed just the opposite.
“Whether the Congress lights the red or green light for an aggression, and whether the prospects of war have been enhanced or faded, President Obama has announced yesterday, by prevaricating or hinting, the start of the historic American retreat,” Al-Thawra said, according to the AP.
Mr. Obama on Saturday sent a letter to congressional leaders and draft legislation on the Authorization for the Use of U.S. Armed Forces (AUMF) in connection to the conflict in Syria, calling the Aug. 21 attack carried out in Damascus that killed more than 1,000 Syrians “flagrant actions” “in violation of international norms and the laws of war.” The draft resolution authorizes Mr. Obama to use the country’s armed forces “as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in connection with the use of chemical weapons or other weapons of mass destruction in the conflict in Syria[.]”
British Prime Minister David Cameron tweeted his support for Mr. Obama’s decision after Parliament last week rejected supporting military action pending the findings of United Nations weapons inspectors.
House Republican leaders said they’ll wait until the end of their five-week summer vacation, which is scheduled to last another week, before coming back to Washington to take up the resolution authorizing the president to strike at Syrian President Bashar Assad’s regime.
The GOP leaders said the intervening week will give Mr. Obama the chance to make a stronger case than he has laid out so far.
“We are glad the president is seeking authorization for any military action in Syria in response to serious, substantive questions being raised,” the GOP leadership said in a statement. “In consultation with the president, we expect the House to consider a measure the week of September 9th.”
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, meanwhile, said in a statement late Saturday that the use of military force against Syria is “justified and necessary,” and that the United States “has a moral as well as a national security interest in defending innocent lives against such atrocities, and in enforcing international norms such as the prohibition against the use of chemical weapons.”
Sen. Robert Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat who is Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman, plans to hold a hearing with administration officials on Tuesday, and the full Senate plans to hold a vote “no later than” the week of Sept. 9, Mr. Reid said.
Sen. Angus King, Maine independent, said on MSNBC on Sunday that “the ghost of Iraq” is haunting the debate.
“I can tell you, the people of Maine absolutely have no appetite in getting involved in another war in the Middle East,” said Mr. King, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Mr. King, however, said Mr. Obama is not asking to inject himself into the ongoing Syrian civil war, but rather that the issue is dealing with the use of chemical weapons by the Syrian regime.
He also pointed out that any action could portend tremendous consequences for the rest of the region, including countries such as Israel and Iran.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- GOP Rep. Tim Murphy rolls out mental health legislation
- George W. Bush to embattled Alabama kicker: You will be stronger
- Black supremacist no longer employed at DHS: report
- Senate pulls all-nighter as GOP protests rules change
- Despite questions, Senate panel backs top Homeland nominee
Latest Blog Entries
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- House pushes through two-year Ryan-Murray budget deal
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow