- The Washington Times - Sunday, August 17, 2014

Lawmakers from both parties are increasingly questioning the Obama administration’s strategy for dealing with a powerful Islamist terrorist group in the Middle East, saying the U.S. should expand its approach, which might include combat troops on the ground in Iraq and airstrikes in Syria.

Since authorizing strikes against the Islamic State group two weeks ago, President Obama has gone to great lengths to assure the American people that no U.S. ground forces will return to war in Iraq. White House officials also have stressed that, although the militants pose a threat to American personnel and interests in the Middle East, the U.S. is not declaring a broad-based war against the group, which now controls swaths of territory in Iraq and Syria.

Islamic State fighters took control of the Mosul Dam, the largest dam in Iraq and one that is critical to water supplies in Baghdad, the capital. U.S. forces over the weekend continued airstrikes against Islamic State positions, including targets around the dam. Kurdish peshmerga forces allied with Washington reportedly wrested back control of at least part of the giant complex from militant control in a counterattack that continued Sunday.

SEE ALSO: Back from vacation, Obama meets with advisers on Iraq

Congressional Republicans and Democrats now say the Obama administration should rethink its carefully limited strategy of airstrikes and logistical support for Iraqi forces.

Some lawmakers are calling for a George W. Bush-style “coalition of the willing” of international partners to launch a broader attack against the Islamic State, whose rapid advances in recent months have stunned Westerners.

Kurdish forces, known as peshmerga, retook parts of Mosul Dam on Sunday, less than two weeks after Baghdad's vital water source was captured by Islamic State fighters. (Associated Press)
Kurdish forces, known as peshmerga, retook parts of Mosul Dam on Sunday, ... more >

Others say U.S. ground troops in Iraq may become necessary, as could airstrikes against Islamic State fighters in neighboring Syria, where the group continues to clash with the forces of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

SEE ALSO: HUMPHRIES: Islamic State collects heads while Obama, Hillary have a hug summit

“We need to do everything we can to repel [the Islamic State],” Rep. Eliot L. Engel of New York, the ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said during an appearance on “Fox News Sunday.”

“I don’t think we have the luxury of putting our heads in the sand and saying, ‘Well, it’s over there and we’re not going to do it,’” Mr. Engel said. “I think what we’re doing now is effective. We’ve got to do more of it. And ultimately, we may have some boots on the ground there. It’s not something I want. But you know what? We have bad choices, and the worst choice is to do nothing.”

Blood and bravado

The brutality and savagery of the Islamic State is becoming clear. Over the weekend, the group — which has slaughtered Christians and other religious minorities in Iraq while vowing to raise the “flag of Allah” at the White House — executed dozens of Iraqi men before abducting their wives and children, The Associated Press reported.

The victims were Yazidis, members of a Kurdish religious minority in Iraq. A week ago, more than 40,000 Yazidis were trapped on a mountaintop in northern Iraq and surrounded by Islamic State forces.

Mr. Obama’s airstrikes were designed to dislodge Islamic State positions around the mountain and allow the Yazidis to escape, which most were able to do. The mission also included airdrops of food and water to the trapped Yazidis.

But even as U.S. forces continued striking Islamic State targets over the weekend, the administration hasn’t budged from its position of limited direct involvement. Defeating the Islamic State group, officials say, is the responsibility of the newly formed Iraqi government.

“When people talk about whether or not the United States is going to be drawn more into another war in Iraq on the ground, I think what they need to know is we’ve laid out what the objectives are for our military, which are protecting our people and carrying out the humanitarian mission,” Ben Rhodes, the White House’s deputy national security adviser, told reporters last week. “The broader effort to take the fight to [the Islamic State] on the ground is being carried out by Iraqi and Kurdish forces, with our training, our arming, our advice. But again, they’re the ones who are engaged in combat.”

Iraqi burden

Story Continues →