- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
EDITORIAL: Benghazi murders were preventable, the White House coverup shameful
A bipartisan Senate committee paints a terrifying prospect of more to come
Question of the Day
The incompetence and irresponsibility at Benghazi turns out to be even worse than everyone in Washington thought it was. A bipartisan Senate intelligence committee finds the murder of the American ambassador and three other Americans was preventable, and the explanations the White House first gave for the debacle were lies.
This is what the Republicans and other conservatives have been saying for months, derided and disputed by defenders of President Obama, and now these are the on-the-record conclusions of the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, made up of equal numbers of Democratic and Republican senators.
The committee said the State Department was warned that it should increase security in the weeks leading up the attack, but did nothing, and the intelligence agencies had crucial information they could have shared, but did not.
“The attacks were preventable,” the committee said, “based on extensive intelligence reporting on the terrorist activity in Libya — to include prior threats and attacks against Western targets — and given the known security shortfalls at the U.S. mission.”
There’s no sign that the government takes this as seriously as it should, and as most Americans no doubt do.
The president’s press spokesman, Jay Carney, offered the usual bland platitudes about how hardworking everybody is at the White House — the president has cooperated with seven congressional committees, 13 hearings, 50 staff briefings and submitted 25,000 pages of blah blah, so there’s nothing to see here and everyone move along, please.
At the State Department, a spokesman said the department is “refining procedures for assessing risk and evaluating security measures,” and suggested that maybe the world is just too dangerous for Americans. “Hard decisions must be made when it comes to whether the United States should operate in dangerous overseas locations.”
The Senate report barely mentioned Hillary Clinton, the former secretary of state, on whose watch the official incompetence and irresponsibility was writ large. Mrs. Clinton will have much to answer for elsewhere, moving forward. The Senate report does not absolve the slain ambassador, J. Christopher Stevens, of complicity for not taking responsibility for the deteriorating security of the Benghazi compound in the weeks before the attack.
In a confidential cable to his superiors, filed three days before the attack on Sept. 11, 2012, Stevens pleaded for “understanding” why the Libyan government was not providing effective security for the American diplomats.
The Libyans, he said, were “wary about the imposition of a strong security apparatus so soon after they expunged Colonel Qaddafi’s.” He conceded the presence of “criminals,” “former regime elements” and “Islamist extremists,” but found “no signs of an organized campaign against the West.
What we are going through — and what people here are resolved to get through — is a confluence rather than a conspiracy.”
The incompetence and irresponsibility of Mr. Obama and Mrs. Clinton is what got an ambassador and three other Americans killed, and the terrifying reality is that incompetence and irresponsibility is what could get a lot of the rest of us killed, “moving forward.”
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Stopping police asset-forfeiture predators
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
- EDITORIAL: Cellphones, steering wheels and safety
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ship tours can foster dialogue
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Latin leaders profit from illegals
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
President wants everyone but himself to pay more
Get Breaking Alerts
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of politicizing business
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title