- The Washington Times - Thursday, February 23, 2006

During the two-day Palestine Solidarity Movement conference that had received substantial advance press coverage for the organizing group’s ties to terrorism and Georgetown University’s willingness to play host, the most disturbing incident revolved around a baby who was several months old.

A handful of conference attendees were standing in a circle making faces at a cute, chubby infant girl, who was being cradled in the arms of her twenty-something, hijab-clad mother. When asked her daughter’s name, the mother responded, “Jenin.” Several cooed with delight, and one young man was particularly excited, widening his eyes and nodding his head vigorously.

The newborn’s name, of course, comes from an incident that occurred in April 2002 during Israel’s Operation Defensive Shield military campaign against terrorist organizations in the West Bank. To the mother and many others at the conference, it is known as the “Jenin Massacre.”

Thing is, there was no massacre. But one would never know it if his only source of information was the PSM conference. For sale at one exhibitor’s table was a DVD about the “massacre” that claimed to show the “footage no one was supposed to get.” Only in a paranoid fantasy, however, could one make such an assertion. CNN, among others, rushed to broadcast early reports of a “massacre,” interviewing on camera almost any Palestinian claiming to have witnessed atrocities. Most of the world was duped.

But when the United Nations—hardly a partisan of the Jewish state—thoroughly investigated the battle at the Jenin refugee camp in the West Bank, it found that no mass slaughter of innocent Palestinians had actually occurred. The UN discovered that contrary to claims of over 500 innocents perishing, only 56 Palestinians died—47 of whom were armed. So few civilians died at Jenin because of the incredible caution exercised by the Israel Defense Forces, which lost 23 of its own.

Emblematic of the PSM conference is that a beautiful young baby forever will be saddled with a name based on a slander, one that perpetuates a cult of victimology while necessarily dehumanizing the entire Jewish state.

Though media was barred from most sessions, this journalist attended the entire conference and enjoyed ample interaction with the 200 or so mostly college students in attendance. While the bulk of the attendees were idealists searching for their own Vietnam, the organizers were knowing manipulators crafting a narrative designed to satisfy that quest.

From the moment an attendee steps past the registration area, the storyline is quite clear: Israel is evil, and Palestinians are pure. Israel is labeled the new South Africa, which is directly tied to the conference’s primary theme: the movement to divest from Israel. Largely ignored were the recent Hamas victory and the campaign of suicide bombings perpetrated by brainwashed Palestinian youths.

It’s not that participants weren’t aware of Palestinian terrorism. One hushed conversation in a hallway overheard by this journalist involved a white woman from the Green Party who kept asking, “Who are we to judge an oppressed people resisting occupation?” The one person in the small group who felt it was appropriate to condemn terrorism nonetheless was quick to add that such criticism “should not be emphasized.”

To perpetuate the story line of Israel as aggressor and Palestinians as victims, the PSM conference constructed an alternate reality, weaving together half-truths and outright fiction to justify the “solidarity” with a society that alternately condones and supports the intentional mass murder of innocent civilians.

What is clear is that most of these young do-gooders do not support terrorism. But they also don’t despise it anywhere near as much as genuinely peaceloving people should.

If attendees didn’t spend much time concerned with Hamas’ victory or Palestinian terrorism, they could be forgiven; neither issue was raised by any of the speakers. Stressed instead were Israel’s “enslavement of Palestinians” starting in 1948, the “massive ethnic cleansing” of 1948 and that the Holocaust has continued since 1948: “Only the victims have changed.”

All the talk about 1948 — the year the Jewish state was founded — belies the common perception that Palestinian activists simply want a state side-by-side with Israel. The PSM conference organizers don’t just want Israel out of the West Bank and Gaza; they want Israel out of Israel.

So nave were the participants that many genuinely believed that a single, unified “Palestine” governed by Muslims would make a hospitable home for Jews. This obviously displays a startling ignorance of both history and modern-day Jew-hating rampant through the Arab and Muslim worlds, but it is in keeping with the conference’s depiction of Palestinians as pristine and peaceful.

By twisting the truth, the PSM conference is not simply warping the minds of impressionable youths with the admirable impulse to save the world. They and other Palestinian partisans are creating a fantasy world so vivid and so rich that it passes as its own reality. This kills any hope for rational debate.

After all, what room is there for meaningful conversation when one side labels Jews as Nazis and believes in a massacre that simply never happened?

Joel Mowbray occasionally writes for The Washington Times.


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide