- The Washington Times - Sunday, July 12, 2009

The glow is off the rose. The euphoria is gone. The thrilled, awe-inspired crowds are no longer there. No, that’s not a reflection on the recent Michael Jackson media madness. Instead, it’s a summary of the Obama family outing to Russia, Italy and Africa.

Other than staged photo ops and a week’s respite from the deepening U.S. financial crisis and the collapse of constitutional government in Honduras, the trip yielded little to give the American people hope that the O-Team comprehends the dangers we face in this world — or what to do about them.

The trip to Chad and the G-8 Summit in L’Aquila, Italy, produced no serious risks to our future — other than the snapshot of President Obama shaking hands with Libya’s colorfully clad Moammar Gadhafi, the usual Euro-pabulum about global warming — now re-branded as “climate change” — being “the greatest threat to mankind,” and empty promises to do more about peacekeeping in Africa. The real damage was done earlier, in Moscow.

According to White House officials busily briefing on what this week’s trip was supposed to achieve, Iran was “front and center” on our president’s agenda. But the Russians dismissed the recent “unpleasantness” in Iran and the thought of any action against the theocrats in Tehran before Mr. Obama even arrived in Moscow.

As Air Force One headed east, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, dutifully following Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s well-honed lead, said, “If I understand correctly, the United States would like to establish more open and more direct relations with Iran. We support this choice. It would be counterproductive to resort to new sanctions.” The O-Team describes this as pragmatism. So much for human rights in Iran.

The O-Team also sought to enlist Russian help in pressuring Iran and North Korea to abandon efforts to develop nuclear weapons and the means of delivering them. About the best it got was an acknowledgment from Mr. Medvedev, “We should make our utmost [effort] to prevent any negative trends there.” To reassure the dubious, he added, “We share the same attitude toward the problem.”

Whether the patently naive Mr. Obama believes this falsehood is unknown. We can only hope that those accompanying our commander in chief know better.

In February, Moscow’s nuclear technicians helped their Iranian counterparts turn on the Russian-built Bushehr nuclear power plant. Despite American overtures to the contrary, the facility is still scheduled to come fully “on line” — and therefore to be generating not only electricity, but also plutonium that can be used in nuclear weapons — before the end of the year.

After spending nearly a full day with Mr. Medvedev, Mr. Obama sat down to a two-hour breakfast with the real power in Moscow, Mr. Putin. Though Mr. Putin said afterward, “With you, we link all our hopes for the furtherance of relations between our two countries,” there is little to show for such platitudes.

Just to make sure everyone knows who calls the shots in the Kremlin, while Mr. Obama and Mr. Putin were sitting down to swap stories over caviar, Kyrgyzstan’s President Kurmanbek Bakiyev did Moscow’s bidding and signed a new lease for the U.S.-built air base at Manas. In February, Mr. Bakiyev announced that the base, a crucial logistics hub for U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan, would be closed this summer. The only change: a price increase from $17 million to $60 million in annual rent. The Russians also announced that U.S. combat troops and supplies can now transit Russian territory to get in and out of Afghanistan. What Mr. Obama had to give away to get these deals hasn’t been announced.

The bottom line is that Russia will continue selling SA-300s — the most advanced air-defense weapons in the world — to Iran. The Russians will not agree to any stringent intervention that might prevent Tehran and Pyongyang from acquiring deliverable nuclear weapons. Worst of all, the “Joint Understanding”on reducing Russian and U.S. nuclear arsenals that Mr. Obama and Mr. Medvedev signed with such a flourish on Monday already is being interpreted differently in Moscow and Washington.

According to the O-Team, the team made it “crystal clear” to the Russians “right from the beginning” that there “is no linkage” between a new Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty and the construction of U.S./NATO ballistic-missile-defense systems in the Czech Republic and Poland. However, shortly after they inked the deal, Mr. Medvedev observed, “The Joint Understanding, which was just signed, declares the link between offensive and defensive armaments. This is a step forward.

“A short time ago, we had nothing but disagreements. Now we confirm this link which enables us to bring our positions closer together.”

In short, somebody isn’t telling the truth.

Like so much else in the Obama administration — whether it is a bank bailout, an “economic stimulus,” health care reform or a tax increase — the devils are in the details. Sure hope someone who cares is reading the fine print.

Oliver North is the host of “War Stories” on the Fox News Channel, the author of “American Heroes” and the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance.

Sign up for Daily Opinion Newsletter

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide