You are currently viewing the printable version of this entry, to return to the normal page, please click here.

28 percent of Republicans would veto women in direct combat

← return to Water Cooler

Nearly three-quarters of Americans say that, given the opportunity, they would vote to allow women to serve in combat roles. So says a Gallup survey conducted on Thursday, following Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s announcement that the Pentagon is lifting the ban on women serving in direct combat.

Those findings are a contrast to 1991, when a Gallup poll posed the same question with added qualifications, specifying that soldiers in a combat role must be “able to kill the enemy by shooting at point-blank range, bayoneting and stabbing, clubbing with rifle butts and strangling. They must also be able to carry wounded soldiers from the battlefield.”

The answer in that era, with those stipulations: 52 percent agreed with the idea of women in combat, 44 percent did not.

These days, there is a modest partisan divide, Gallup finds.

In the current poll, seven out of 10 Republicans agree with the idea of sending women into combat. But 28 percent say they would vote against it. Among Democrats, 83 percent agree while 14 percent do not. Men and women are almost equal in their sentiments: 73 percent and 76 percent, respectively, agree with the idea of women in direct combat.

Only one group is relatively cool to the idea. Among those 50 and older, 63 percent agree, while about third do not.

On a historic note, Gallup has been plumbing public opinion about the issue for over two decades.”Should women in the U.S. military serve in actual combat roles if it becomes necessary in the current situation in the Mid East involving Iraq and Kuwait, or not?” the pollster asked in 1990.

The answer: 60 percent of Americans approved of the idea, 37 percent did not.

← return to Water Cooler

blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Illustration by Greg Groesch/The Washington Times

    LAMBRO: Skirting the lane-closure issue

  • Illustration by Linas Garsys/The Washington Times

    LYONS: Benghazi demands a select committee in Congress

  • Happening Now