Almost half of Americans would 'destroy' an invasive drone

← return to Water Cooler

Bristling with cameras and sensors, unmanned drones patrol borders and industrial pipelines here and abroad. They peek at troubled neighborhoods, wildlife areas and are now used in experimental news gathering projects by edgy journalists. They can be hefty aircraft, or out-of-the-box toys; some armed, most not.

Drone videos are indeed popular online.

But imagine this: You spot a drone from a law enforcement agency flying over your house taking videos or photos. Do you have the “right” to destroy it?

Almost half of Americans - 47 percent - say why, yes, you do.

Another 47 percent say no, leave that drone alone. So says a Reason/Rupe poll released Friday. The poll also found uncommon agreement among the political parties: 50 percent of Republicans and 55 percent of Democrats say citizens do not have the right to destroy the device under such circumstances.

The American Civil Liberties Union, meanwhile, has already issued “safeguards” for drone use, with an eye on privacy. Among their recommendations:

“Drones should be deployed by law enforcement only with a warrant, in an emergency, or when there are specific and articulable grounds to believe that the drone will collect evidence relating to a specific criminal act.”

“Images should be retained only when there is reasonable suspicion that they contain evidence of a crime or are relevant to an ongoing investigation or trial.”

“Usage policy on domestic drones should be decided by the public’s representatives, not by police departments, and the policies should be clear, written, and open to the public. Use of domestic drones should be subject to open audits and proper oversight to prevent misuse.”

“Domestic drones should not be equipped with lethal or non-lethal weapons.”

← return to Water Cooler

blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Illustration by Greg Groesch/The Washington Times

    LAMBRO: Skirting the lane-closure issue

  • Illustration by Linas Garsys/The Washington Times

    LYONS: Benghazi demands a select committee in Congress

  • Happening Now