- The Washington Times - Thursday, September 29, 2011

It’s the Jewish New Year. Rosh Hashanah is followed by Yom Kippur. We listen to that strange instrument called the shofar, made of a ram’s horn, with long plaintive and short bleating notes resounding in synagogues around the world.

The mix of dissonance and energy calls for reflection and renewal, and we’ve got a lot to reflect on, particularly now that Israel and the Palestinians once more are the focus of ferocious debate. (As they always seem to be.)

Jews once raised glasses of sweet wine with a toast, “Next year in Jerusalem.” It was a wistful challenge to hope in remembrance of their ancient temple, twice destroyed. In the aftermath of the Holocaust, Jews around the world felt it all the more crucial to regain a homeland, to have a place where they could be safe and secure. The world, or most of it, agreed. The Nazis had targeted the Jews for extermination, and it was time for the Jews to have their own sacred homeland. Now they have the homeland of that famous toast but must fight constantly to keep it.

The U.N. General Assembly, on a remarkable day in November 1947 (before the United Nations had become an international joke) endorsed the idea of two states in Palestine, one for Jews, to be called Israel, and the other for Arabs, to be called whatever they wanted to call it. The Arabs rejected the idea. They were determined to destroy the Jews and get it all. The secretary-general of the Arab League announced on Cairo radio: “This will be a war of extermination and a momentous massacre.”

It didn’t happen, but only because the Jews took on Arab armies from the region and whipped them all. The Jews went on to govern themselves and built a prosperous, independent state. The Palestinians have spent the years since nourishing violent grievance.

The “what if” questions abounded last week when Mahmoud Abbas asked the United Nations for instant endorsement of a Palestinian state without resolving disputes with Israel. What if the Palestinians had accepted statehood when it was offered to them 64 years ago? Life in the Middle East could have been very different for everyone.

There was only one, brief, breathtaking moment in 1977, when Egyptian President Anwar Sadat surprised everyone with a promise that he would travel anywhere, “even Jerusalem,” to discuss peace. He redeemed that promise and paid for it at the hands of Egyptian assassins.

Mahmoud Abbas, alas, is no Anwar Sadat, despite the pale imitation of a warrior he offered after his speech to the U.N. “I’m ready to meet any Israeli official at any time he wants,” he told Fox News. “But to me only for a meeting I think is useless.” Mr. Abbas revealed himself to be only a puffed up poser.

President Obama, with his history of “tough love” for the Israelis and pandering to the Palestinians, wanted to dissuade Mr. Abbas from making a spectacle at the U.N. but was unable to summon the courage to do what was necessary. Afterward, the president, aware of his offense to the Jews and other friends of Israel, gave a strong speech to the General Assembly, saying the usual nice things about peace. But the United States wants most of all to be spared having to use its veto in the Security Council. The Europeans are so cowed in the face of big talk from the Arabs that such “world powers” as Nigeria, Gabon and Bosnia have the balance of power in the Security Council. In the spirit of the times, Mr. Abbas returned home to a hero’s welcome, promising a “Palestinian Spring.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu got it right when he called the spectacle at the U.N. a performance at the “theater of the absurd.” With Lebanon, controlled by Hezbollah, presiding over the U.N. Security Council, we’re treated to the pretense of terrorists presiding over the world’s security.

Mr. Obama reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to Israel, such as it may be, in a video message wishing the Israelis a happy new year: “As Jewish tradition teaches us, we may not complete the work, but that must never keep us from trying.” The sentiment deserves several blasts of the ram’s horn and a little reflection over what might have been if the Palestinians had taken the offered gift of statehood more than a half-century ago. We can only dream of what the world might have been spared.

Suzanne Fields is a syndicated columnist.