- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
- Family removed from Southwest flight over tweet about rude agent, dad says
- Michael Bloomberg thumbs FAA ban, plots course to Israel
- California bans full-contact football practices in off-season
- Thune: Downed fighter jets show more evidence of separatist capabilities
- Obama tells DNC fundraising crowd: ‘I’m not overly partisan’
- Chambliss: Downed jet ultimately goes back to Putin
- Perdue strategy: Run against Reid, Obama, Pelosi
- White House: More changes to contraception mandate coming
- ‘Operation Normandy’ set to send 3,500 volunteers to border to ‘stop an invasion’
Obama gives Syrian rebels recognition
U.S. move pressures Assad
Question of the Day
President Obama said on Tuesday that the United States will formally recognize a coalition of Syrian opposition groups as that country’s legitimate representative, intensifying pressure on President Bashar Assad’s embattled regime.
“We’ve made a decision that the Syrian opposition coalition is now inclusive enough, is reflective and representative enough of the Syrian population that we consider them the legitimate representative of the Syrian people in opposition to the Assad regime,” Mr. Obama said in an interview with Barbara Walters of ABC News.
The decision to recognize the opposition, formally known as the National Coalition of Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces, came just hours after the State Department administration issued another directive designating an al Qaeda-affiliated Syrian rebel group as a foreign terrorist organization — an indication that the Obama administration is scrambling to draw a red line between what it considers acceptable and unacceptable rebels in Syria.
The announcements came on the eve of a meeting in Morocco of Syrian opposition leaders and their Western and Arab supporters.
A senior U.S. official who is attending the meeting in Morocco told reporters in a background briefing on Tuesday that no rebel military commanders will attend the meeting.
Syrian rebels, meanwhile, lashed out at the Obama administration for designating their al Qaeda-affiliated partner as a foreign terrorist group.
The State Department announced it had listed the al-Nusrah Front as one of the aliases of al Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), which was designated a terrorist organization in 2004. Abu Du’a, the emir of al Qaeda in Iraq, controls the front, according to U.S. officials.
The terrorist designation makes it illegal for U.S. citizens to provide material support to the group and freezes any assets the al-Nusrah Front, also known as Jabhat Nusra, may have in the United States.
“Not everybody who’s participating on the ground in fighting Assad are people who we are comfortable with,” Mr. Obama told Ms. Walters. “There are some who, I think, have adopted an extremist agenda, an anti-U.S. agenda, and we are going to make clear to distinguish between those elements.”
Many Syrian rebels, frustrated by a Western reluctance to provide them with arms, think that the al-Nusrah Front has played an effective role in the 21-month-old fight against the Assad regime.
Ammar Abdulhamid, a Syrian human rights activist and a fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told a national security conference in Washington last week that the Obama administration suffered from an “absolute lack of vision,” and as a result, he predicted, Syria would be a problem for “many years to come.”
“If you don’t provide us with the tools to topple the regime, we will join with the devil,” said Mousab Azzawi of the Syrian Network for Human Rights, part of the Syrian opposition. “If the U.S. wants to put an end to al-Nusrah, they should support the other groups to turn the table on the regime and end this suffering.”
The official recognition of the opposition could open the door to the U.S. arming the rebels.
“For us, providing arms has to be done in a way that helps promote a political solution,” said the senior U.S. official who spoke on background. “And until we understand how these arms promote a political solution, we do not see how provision of arms is a good idea.”
The civil war, which erupted in March 2011, has killed more than 40,000 people, according to estimates provided by Syrian activists.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ashish Kumar Sen is a reporter covering foreign policy and international developments for The Washington Times.
Prior to joining The Times, Mr. Sen worked for publications in Asia and the Middle East. His work has appeared in a number of publications and online news sites including the British Broadcasting Corp., Asia Times Online and Outlook magazine.
- Boko Haram takes credit for abduction of Nigerian schoolgirls, threatens to sell them
- Al Qaeda core degraded, but 'more aggressive' affiliates still pose threat to U.S.
- Political uncertainty and violence in first Iraqi election since U.S. withdraw
- Egypt judge sentences 683 Islamists to death over Morsi-tied violence
- Doctor's killing in latest Afghanistan attack puts NGOs in crosshairs
TWT Video Picks
Retailer pays a price for getting too close to Obama
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Two Ukrainian fighter jets shot down
- HURT: The cost of 'free' water in Detroit
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- DEACE: How to go from civil rights icon to bigot in one quote
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq