- ‘Tis the Season: London florist creates $4.6 million Christmas wreath
- No tailgating allowed at Super Bowl XLVIII
- Pentagon to transport African troops to Central African Republic
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend’s shopping jumps to his death
- Ukraine leader to talk with protesters; Washington urges caution
- Pope Francis: A nun saved my life
- Israeli P.M. Netanyahu backs out of Mandela funeral
- Elian Gonzalez makes first trip outside Cuba since custody battle
- U.S., British intelligence agents enter online sci-fi world to spy on gamers
- Sarah Palin to host the outdoors show ‘Amazing America’
EDITORIAL: The Facebook fiasco
Market weaknesses raised by failed IPO
Met any Facebook millionaires? The country was supposed to be awash in them by now. But unless they are among the privileged few Facebook insiders, investors probably either lost money on the website’s initial public offering (IPO) or were smart enough to wait and see. The debut was so poorly handled that financial regulators will soon be looking into it.
For a while last week, it seemed like the Internet boom of the late 1990s had returned. America was seized with the kind of irrational euphoria that quickly made and lost fortunes when the dot-com bubble popped in March 2000. Headlines promised instant riches. Facebook’s IPO was spring-loaded to soar. U2’s Bono, an early investor, would be richer than the surviving Beatles. Facebook was going to be such a strong opener that it would boost the entire sagging market. So said the hype.
Others predicted a political game-changer. Michael Mandel of the Progressive Policy Institute speculated in the Atlantic that the “Zuckmentum” from the IPO might spark a “sudden acceleration of growth and job creation fueled by the smartphone/communications boom” that it could be a boon for President Obama’s political fortunes and trouble for Mitt Romney. Alas, the “App Economy” still awaits. If a billion downloads of “Angry Birds” hasn’t saved the Obama presidency, Facebook won’t either.
As of market close on Tuesday, the stock had suffered three down trading days and is well below its IPO price of $38. This isn’t a total shocker. Facebook was priced at the high end of its projected value, and 122 times its earnings. More established tech stocks like Microsoft, Apple and especially Google, which is seen as a direct competitor, are priced between 10 and 20 times earnings. By those standards, Facebook should be trading under $10. Shortly before the IPO went live, General Motors dropped Facebook advertisements - a major source or revenue - citing poor return on investment. Since the company was offering no new products, innovations or features, the main argument in favor of the investment seemed to be simply the fact that it was Facebook.
Add in Nasdaq technical glitches, sales that didn’t go through, sales that went through that shouldn’t have and a mysterious last-minute cut in revenue forecasts from lead underwriter Morgan Stanley, and there are all the makings for an ugly investigation. On Tuesday, Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chairman Mary Schapiro said after a Senate banking committee hearing that while “there is a lot of reason to have confidence in our markets and in the integrity of how they operate … there are issues that we need to look at specifically with respect to Facebook.” Regarding the abrupt cut in revenue forecasts, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Chairman Rick Ketchum said, “The allegations, if true, are a matter of regulatory concern.”
As it stands now, most of people who will make money on Facebook are the insiders who crafted the deal, and the farsighted outsiders who bet against it. All other investors are simply waiting for the right time to defriend the stock that was supposed to save the day.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Lights out in Venezuela
- EDITORIAL: Health care hardball
- EDITORIAL: IRS doubles down
- VIDEO: Emily Miller on CNBC on Obamacare leaving more people losing insurance than new enrollees
- EDITORIAL: Our ideological president
Latest Blog Entries
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
Get Breaking Alerts
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- Satanists petition for statue at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- Ted Cruz sees legal landmines ahead for Obamacare
- Obama lied about Syrian chemical attack, 'cherry-picked' intelligence: report
- MILLER: Brady Campaign says Colorado recalls due to NRA, not grassroots opposition to gun control
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Tech companies call for an end to NSA online snooping
- MSNBC host: Obamacare a 'wealthy white men' racist word