- Argentina beats Dutch in shootout to reach World Cup final
- Tanard Jackson suspended indefinitely by NFL — again
- FAA investigating fireworks drone flights
- Pentagon: We’ll give Obama a drone strike with al-Baghdadi’s name on it
- Marine in Mexican custody to get day in court after 101 days
- Senate OKs San Antonio mayor as housing secretary
- NFL star likely fooled by Marine impostor who accepted first-class plane ticket
- Sen. Ted Cruz tweets Obama directions from fundraisers to border towns
- Israel hits key Hamas targets in Gaza offensive
- Ten-year sentence for New Orleans’ Nagin on graft charges
EDITORIAL: Sandy slaps Uncle Sam’s handouts
Federal flood insurance risks Mother Nature’s fury
Question of the Day
Shaking up the election wasn't the biggest problem with last week's hurricane. Owning an ocean-view vacation bungalow or retirement home is part of the American dream. For thousands, the dream turned nightmarish as Hurricane Sandy ravaged seaside towns along the Atlantic coastline. As rebuilding efforts proceed, it's essential to acknowledge an uncomfortable truth: Uncle Sam has been encouraging construction in the most danger-prone areas. That's something that has to change.
Sandy's wide path of destruction demolished or damaged homes and businesses from Maryland to Massachusetts. Covered losses of $10-$20 billion plus lost productivity could result in a $50 billion hit to the economy, according to Eqecat Inc., a catastrophic-risk consultancy. Private homeowners' insurance generally takes care of wind damage, but a separate flood policy is required to cover destruction caused by rising water. The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), established by Congress in 1968, allows residents of flood-prone areas to purchase insurance backed by the federal government. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) produces flood-hazard maps that designate communities eligible for subsidized insurance.
Rates average an affordable $585 a year -- and that's the problem: NFIP doesn't collect enough in flood-insurance premiums to cover payouts. FEMA has around $3.6 billion in its disaster-relief fund, according to agency administrator Craig Fugate. That's a small fraction of the amount that will be spent on claims filed as a result of Sandy's destruction. When the fund is exhausted, Congress will likely replenish it with taxpayer cash, sticking everyone across the country with the bill for rebuilding demolished East Coast communities. Covered losses of $20 billion would end up costing Americans around $250 per household.
Meteorologists called Sandy a "superstorm" due to its 1,000-mile breadth rather than its modest Category 1 intensity. In recent memory, only Katrina in 2005 cracked the National Hurricane Center's list of the top five hurricanes. By comparison, that storm reached Category 5 strength before inflicting $84 billion in damage across the New Orleans region. More important than a storm's intensity is its track, and Sandy slammed into the nation's most populous coastline.
Americans have become accustomed to appealing to Big Brother for financial assistance when disaster strikes, but the government is broke and can't afford to keep writing checks for flood-zone bailouts. Congress acted smartly when it reauthorized the NFIP in July and included a phaseout of flood-insurance subsidies for vacation homes in flood zones. FEMA should also move boundaries for its flood-hazard maps away from vulnerable shorelines, shrinking regions eligible for subsidized insurance.
With federal flood insurance, Uncle Sam skews risk assessments intended to mitigate the danger of building in flood-prone areas. In doing so, Washington is inadvertently contributing to storm-related death and destruction. Policies that encourage Americans to build their dreams too close to coastlines vulnerable to Mother Nature's wrath are neither compassionate nor financially sound.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: What’s Obama hiding at illegal-alien 'refugee' camps?
- EDITORIAL: No free pass on gun rights for red-state Democrats
- EDITORIAL: iFiasco in the classroom
- ABATI: Nigeria's offensive against Boko Haram
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Douglass would abhor affirmative action
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Ted Cruz
Banning speech with a constitutional amendment is playing with fire
Get Breaking Alerts
- GOP: Lerner warned IRS employees to hide information from Congress
- White House plans for bowling alley upgrades abruptly cancelled
- ISTOOK: Flying illegals home would be 99.5 percent cheaper than Obamas plan
- Obama requests $3.7 billion to fight surge of illegals
- Power grab: EPA wants to garnish wages of polluters
- Costco to re-stock Dinesh D'Souza's 'America' after public outry
- Illegal immigrants showing up at border with 'Yes we can' Obama shoes: report
- CARSON: Health savings accounts far better than Obamacare
- Facebook allows 'Kill Kendall Jones' page, but deletes her game hunting photos
- Dinesh D'Souza book yanked from Costco shelves