- DOJ reaches largest-ever federal government settlement over auto loan discrimination
- U.S. Navy to start giving gay couples marriage benefits in Japan
- Sen. Harry Reid goes to hospital as a precaution
- Fla.’s Trey Radel exits rehab, ‘excited’ to resume congressional role
- U.S. nuclear general boozed it up, chased ‘hot women’ in Russia: report
- 45 Calif. students at one school test positive for tuberculosis exposure
- Rob Ford on women: Give them cash ‘and they are happy’
- Ku Klux Klan group holds recruitment meeting in Maryland
- Airport assassination: Mayor, 3 others killed at Manila airport
- Tea party-type lawmakers take mysterious, off-books trip to Mideast
Inside the Beltway: Clapper on the record
Question of the Day
Media frenzy over old news that the National Security Agency monitors the vast patterns of citizen communications has distracted and alarmed the public, leaving it to ponder both the content of the Fourth Amendment and the motivations of newly uncloaked “whistleblower” Edward Snowden, a former IT security contractor with the federal agency who shared its clandestine details with a pair of news organizations. But wait. National Intelligence Director James R. Clapper issued some details of his own via a straightforward public statement about the stakes at hand:
“Over the last week, we have seen reckless disclosures of intelligence community measures used to keep Americans safe. In a rush to publish, media outlets have not given the full context — including the extent to which these programs are overseen by all three branches of government — to these effective tools,” Mr. Clapper said.
“In particular, the surveillance activities published in The Guardian and The Washington Post are lawful and conducted under authorities widely known and discussed, and fully debated and authorized by Congress. Their purpose is to obtain foreign intelligence information, including information necessary to thwart terrorist and cyberattacks against the United States and its allies.
“Our ability to discuss these activities is limited by our need to protect intelligence sources and methods. Disclosing information about the specific methods the government uses to collect communications can obviously give our enemies a ‘playbook’ of how to avoid detection,” he notes.
Mr. Clapper also released pertinent details about Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which offers parameters about intelligence methodology and is a must-read for those concerned about their privacy and/or media hysteria. Find it here: Dni.gov under the “Newsroom” heading.
And an odd cultural moment of sorts: Both filmmaker Michael Moore and independent media mogul Glenn Beck praised the aforementioned Mr. Snowden in simultaneous tweets after The Guardian revealed his identity on Sunday. Mr. Moore: “hero of the year.” Mr. Beck: “the NSA patriot leaker.”
AMERICANS ALREADY KNOW
The full results won’t be released until Thursday, but an upcoming Allstate/National Journal Heartland Monitor poll reveals that 85 percent of Americans say it’s likely that their “communications history, like phone calls, emails, and Internet use,” was “available for businesses, government, individuals, and other groups to access without their consent.”
The poll also found that cellphone and Internet service providers both ranked toward the lower end of institutions that Americans “trust to responsibly use information” about them. In each case, almost half of respondents said they trusted those institutions “not very much” or “not at all.”
HOLD THE PHONE
“Dear [Decision Maker]: The Obama administration is currently overseeing the mass confiscation of private phone records. This practice is a gross violation of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the spirit of American justice.”
“I do not urge, but demand immediate action be taken to curb this abuse of power. The government has no right to collect and store the private data of otherwise innocent Americans.”
— Suggested text for a letter of protest to lawmakers and officials launched by FreedomWorks on Friday; 3,000 have already been sent via email.
“Whether it’s a Republican or a Democrat occupying the White House, this is what big government looks like, unless we act now to stop it,” notes Matt Kibbe, president of the 4-million member grass-roots group.
FAITH AND FREEDOM
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Inside the Beltway: Who does Congress work for anyway?
- Inside the Beltway: Larry Klayman's spiritual calling
- Legal gadfly in NSA surveillance case can sting even his own mother in pursuit of principles
- Legal gadfly can sting NSA, even his own mother
- Inside the Beltway: Newest Obamacare Website fixer
Latest Blog Entries
- 90 percent of Americans say Congress 'acts like they don't have a boss'
- A media-intense holiday moment with Armstrong Williams
- The most questionable quotes of the year: Yes, MSNBC wins
- Gallup: Americans trust their car salesmen more than Congress
- Painter, biker, slightly grunge: George W. Bush becomes the new hipster icon
By John McAfee
- Breaking Fad: Alligators becoming the new pit bulls for drug dealers, cops say
- D.C. to tout Obamacare among youth waiting for Air Jordans
- Huge backlash mounts over suspension of 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson
- TARGET credit card theft swells to 40 million victims
- Special ops vets slam military benefit cuts
- Obama: 2014 will be 'breakthrough year' for U.S.
- Dems use new filibuster rules to approve DHS nominee Alejandro Mayorkas under investigation
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Citing 'unfair system,' Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow