- Running on empty: EPA slashes biofuel goals because of ethanol shortage
- ‘Gay Jeans’ that fade into rainbow-colored denim created
- Divided court strikes down big porn award
- Jimmy Carter: Don’t hurt Russian people with sanctions
- Oldest ex-MLB player dies in Cuba, 2 days shy of 103rd birthday
- ‘Top Gun’ for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy’s approval
- Bill Clinton to endorse Charlie Rangel for re-election
- Pfc. Bradley Manning is now Pfc. Chelsea Manning: Court says so
- Secret base U.S. special forces used to train Libyans now under terrorist control: report
- 9th suspect in N.C. kidnapping turns self in to FBI
Congress closing longstanding loophole on farm subsidies
Addressing a longstanding criticism of the farm bill, lawmakers are closing a loophole federal investigators said allowed people to get government benefits without actually doing work.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture hands out roughly $5 billion annually in payments and farm subsidies, but the requirements aren’t stringent enough to stop payments to people who aren’t actively engaged in farming, investigators said.
Now both the House and Senate have passed legislation that would require individuals to “make a significant contribution of personal labor” to a farm in order to receive benefits.
“It’s a change that’s long overdue,” said Daren Bakst, an agricultural policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. “It’s been an abuse that’s existed that’s allowed people who really have no role in farming to get payments.”
The money went to support not only farm workers but also managers. Yet the definition of what qualified as “management” was too broad, according to the Government Accountability Office, Congress‘ chief watchdog arm.
The Farm Service Agency that oversees the funding had difficulty determining “whether an individual had made a significant contribution of active personal management, potentially allowing individuals who may have had limited involvement in a farming operation to receive payments,” GAO said.
Mr. Bakst said the system allowed for abuse by people who received money for farms on which they rarely — if ever — worked.
“The concern is that you create a general partnership and get a bunch of people that you say have a management role that live five states away and really have nothing to do with the farm,” he said.
The general partnerships receive the most money and have the most potential for abuse, GAO said. The largest such partnership received almost $652,000 in 2012, based on 16 different people claiming they were managing the farm.
Now both the House and Senate have passed legislation that would only allow a single person per farm to be considered a manager. Mr. Bakst said the final bill being negotiated in Congress has a good chance to pass and be sent to the president for a signature.
Sen. Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican who serves on the Senate Agriculture Committee, said there’s been too much subterfuge under the current law.
“The loophole has been allowed to stand for too long,” he said in a news release. “It’s time to close it once and for all and put the issue to rest so we can maintain a safety net for the farmers who really need it.”
GAO investigators have document several examples of questionable behavior under the current rules. One farm in the Midwest listed 11 different people as providing personal management, including two who lived hundreds of miles away in southern Florida. One of the Florida residents was 88 years old, while another person listed as a manager was only 16 when he or she first began getting payments from the government.
And another farm paid three full-time managers according to their records, yet listed an additional eight people as managers when applying for federal benefits, GAO said.
Oversight has been ineffective, investigators argued, and most people were taken at their word when they claimed to work on farms. In a 2009 survey of 688 people who claimed management responsibilities, FSA state offices disqualified only four individuals.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Phillip Swarts is an investigative reporter for The Washington Times, covering fiscal waste, fraud and political ethics. He is a graduate of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University and previously worked as an investigative reporter for the Washington Guardian. Phillip can be reached at email@example.com.
- Post office may have sold off valuable art, properties
- HHS Secretary Sebelius lobbied private companies for Obamacare support, investigation finds
- Sebelius pressured major corporations to support Obamacare
- Golden Hammer: Easter candy bitter taste for taxpayers?
- GOLDEN HAMMER: Bad Easter candy? Government sugar subsidies cost taxpayers millions
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Obama's veil of secrecy is pierced
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Obama avoids 'red line' for China, prepared to impose tougher sanctions on Russia
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Russian bombers buzz U.K. airspace; jets scrambled to chase off 'Bears'
- Kansas will nullify local regulation of guns
- ISTOOK: Obama's sleight of hand hides hidden government's work
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014