- The Washington Times - Tuesday, May 27, 2014

First lady Michelle Obama on Tuesday chided congressional Republicans for attempting to roll back her school lunch standards, calling the effort “unacceptable” and accusing lawmakers of playing politics with the health of young students.

The unusual step by Mrs. Obama, who largely has avoided political scuffles during her husband’s time in office, underscores the growing unrest around the initiative and a real chance that the standards, at least in their current form, may not survive much longer.

The first lady now is going toe-to-toe with lawmakers in the House and Senate, where proposals to alter the lunch guidelines are gaining traction as students flee the program in droves.


SEE ALSO: White House charts ‘sustained level of engagement’ for Michelle Obama


In just the past year, daily participation in federally funded school lunch programs has declined by more than 1 million students, according to the School Nutrition Association, even though the number of eligible students has increased by 1.2 million.

But those realities — coupled with highly publicized instances of students turning up their noses at healthier meals or dumping them into trash cans — aren’t dissuading Mrs. Obama, who has made nutrition and fitness, especially among children, her primary focus.

Her comments Tuesday show her passion about the issue and how dramatic changes to the program would be, to some degree, a personal defeat for her.


SEE ALSO: Michelle Obama tells senior high-schoolers to monitor families for racism


“This is unacceptable,” she said during a White House meeting with school nutrition officials, slamming a Republican-backed proposal that would allow districts to opt out of the standards if they lose money on lunch programs over a six-month period.

“It’s unacceptable to me not just as first lady but also as a mother. The last thing we can afford to do right now is play politics with our kids’ health,” she said. “Now is not the time to roll back everything we have worked for.”

The standards became law in December 2010, when President Obama signed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act. The legislation requires students to be served more fruits and vegetables and limits the amount of sweets and processed foods in school cafeterias across the country.

The program also limits the calorie count of a school meal to 850.

There is virtually no argument that healthy food in schools is a noble goal as part of a broader effort to fight childhood obesity, but the rigid nature of the standards has led to a backlash among students and school cafeteria workers, who are petitioning Congress for relief.

“The administration’s own data proves that student participation in school lunch is abruptly down in 48 states despite rising school enrollment and 30 years of steady program growth,” Leah Schmidt, president of the School Nutrition Association, said in a statement Tuesday.

SNA does not want to gut the nutrition standards — we support many of the requirements. Our request for flexibility under the new standards does not come from industry or politics. It comes from thousands of school cafeteria professionals who have shown how these overly prescriptive regulations are hindering their effort to get students to eat healthy school meals,” Ms. Schmidt said.

Last week, the House Appropriations subcommittee on agriculture passed a bill to address complaints that some schools are losing money by being forced to buy healthier, often more expensive food while demand continues to decline.

More than 500 schools nationwide have dropped out of the program this school year, according to the Agriculture Department.

Story Continues →