- The Washington Times - Tuesday, November 8, 2011

For every uninformed liberal criticizing the Pentagon (“Critics on left hit Pentagon on talk of budget disasters,” Web, Sunday), there’s a Democratic expert like Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta or Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton who understands that Pentagon spending didn’t cause our budget problems and hollowing out the military won’t solve them.

Defense is far from overfunded - it’s just 16 percent of federal spending, down from 40 percent in the 1970s. Investment in research and modernization, the bulwark of our battlefield supremacy, is just a quarter of that. But count on these vital investments bearing the brunt of cuts if the deficit-reduction supercommittee fails to reach a consensus.

As a result, the budget ax could fall on the drones supporting our special forces and the air power that transports and supports them. Research that brought us smart bombs, stealth fighters and improvised-explosive-device jammers could grind to a halt.

On top of that, the trigger cuts would add a point to the unemployment rate, pushing it past 10 percent and costing a million jobs, according to the Department of Defense.

Defense spending is not driving the deficit, and it would pose terrible consequences for our national security if liberals perpetuate the myth that it is.


President, Frontiers of Freedom


Sign up for Daily Opinion Newsletter

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide