Skip to content
Advertisement

The Washington Times

Welcome to On Background, the politics newsletter that brings you insights from Capitol Hill to the campaign trail from veteran journalists at The Washington Times.

If this newsletter has been shared with you, click here to sign up to receive On Background from Dave Boyer and Susan Ferrechio every Friday morning.

Far-left Democrats scored their biggest primary win of the midterm elections, causing Republicans to break into a version of President Trump’s “YMCA” happy dance.

Abdul El‑Sayed won narrowly in Michigan’s Senate primary over Rep. Haley Stevens, who had the endorsements and the campaign donations of the Democratic Party’s establishment.

Mr. El-Sayed’s victory is causing many party leaders to wonder whether their base is moving further left without them on issues such as universal health care and breaking U.S. ties with Israel. It’s a win for Sen. Bernard Sanders‘ wing of the party and another blow to Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer of New York.

Mr. El‑Sayed’s charisma and support from young and college‑educated voters helped him overcome more than $70 million spent against him, including more than $30 million from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a powerful pro-Israel lobby.

“What we showed is that the power of our money is greater than the power of their money,” Mr. El‑Sayed said. “My hope is that our democracy will never be the same.”

Mr. El‑Sayed now heads into a statewide showdown with Republican former Rep. Mike Rogers, potentially determining whether Republicans retain the Senate majority.

Republicans did not bother to hide their glee, convinced that Democrats are moving rapidly away from mainstream American voters. Six Democratic House incumbents have lost primaries so far this year.

Joe Gruters, chair of the Republican National Committee, likened Mr. El‑Sayed to New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, saying he “embodies the socialist takeover that wants to do away with the American way of life by abolishing ICE, opening borders, raising taxes and sympathizing with terrorists.”

The National Republican Senatorial Committee, the Senate GOP’s campaign arm, released a digital ad branding Mr. El‑Sayed “the most radical Senate candidate in America.” It used his full name, Abdulrahman Mohamed El‑Sayed, and paired it with a clip of him declaring, “I’m pretty damn dangerous.”

The ad accused Mr. El‑Sayed of being a terrorist sympathizer and backing tax increases that would hit “Michigan waitresses, delivery drivers and seniors on Social Security.”

President Trump characterized Mr. El‑Sayed’s victory as a boost for Republicans defending their slim majority this fall. “Great news for the Republican Party. El‑Sayed, a Communist loser who hates Jews and Israel, is the projected winner in his race,” Mr. Trump said before votes were completely tallied Tuesday night.

Many Democrats portray the win as a victory for the populist side of their party over corporate and billionaire donor elites — not a sign of growing socialism. The outcome of the November elections likely will hinge on whether Democrats can convince independent-minded voters about that in the face of Mr. Trump’s red scare.

Mr. El‑Sayed said he is ready to confront the president and the entrenched powers he says have left the working class behind.

“I’m so sorry if you want a senator who’s going to lick some boots; fine, go vote for Mike Rogers,” he told supporters. “But if you want a senator who’s going to stand up to Donald Trump, then you’ve got your option right here.”

Mr. Rogers returned fire, saying the contest is a choice between “common sense or complete insanity” and that Democrats have driven “our state into the ground.”

“Abdul isn’t just another liberal. He’s an extremist,” he said in a statement, warning that the Democrat is a terrorist sympathizer, supports soft‑on‑crime policies that would make communities less safe and is “leading a movement grounded in ideological fanaticism.”

The matchup instantly becomes central to the fight for Senate control, with both parties bracing for a multimillion‑dollar battle in a state that has swung back and forth in recent cycles.

In the Trump administration

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., from left, acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and Vice President JD Vance attend a cabinet meeting, Friday, July 31, 2026, at Camp David, the presidential retreat, near Thurmont, Md., Friday, July 31, 2026. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Blanche nomination. The Senate Judiciary Committee voted to confirm Todd Blanche as Mr. Trump’s choice for attorney general, overcoming objections from Democrats and some Republicans about his personal loyalty to the president. Mr. Blanche formerly served as Citizen Trump’s private lawyer.

The vote moved his nomination toward an expected confirmation by the full Senate on Friday.

In Mr. Blanche’s confirmation hearing, Republicans said the president deserves to have his man in office — particularly since Mr. Blanche has been serving as acting attorney general for four months after the ouster of Pam Bondi.

“Todd Blanche’s Justice Department has reprioritized the safety of Americans after the Biden administration opened the borders to violent criminals and then turned a blind eye to the heinous crimes that were happening around the country,” said Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican and chairman of the committee.

Democrats said Mr. Blanche has amassed an “avalanche of misconduct” in defense of Mr. Trump.

“He is about Trump, not truth,” said Sen. Cory Booker, New Jersey Democrat. “This is so deeply wrong. We will rue the day we let this man have this much power under a corrupt president.”

The nomination became a referendum on Mr. Trump’s $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund, which he sought to create as part of a settlement in his $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS for allowing his secret tax information to be leaked.

Mr. Blanche signed off on the fund, plus on an immunity deal for Mr. Trump and two of his sons for past tax arrears — then tried to bury the fund as dead. Mr. Blanche finally issued new memos rescinding the fund and clarifying the extent of the tax immunity deal for Mr. Trump, which was good enough to sway the GOP holdouts, Sens. John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina.

Mr. Trump lamented the Justice Department officially rescinding the proposed fund for people who said they were victims of political prosecutions, including defendants charged in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol.

“These people were treated horribly and [the proposed fund] could have given them some solace,” Mr. Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. “I view the fund as a positive, and a lot of Republicans do too. Not so many Democrats.”

The president has absorbed a series of rebukes in recent days, including two by his own appointees who left him fuming. Taken together, the reversals carry real costs in political capital that go beyond a bruised ego.

In a span of three days, Mr. Trump’s Justice Department dropped a marquee case of alleged vandalism of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, Mr. Blanche scrapped the president’s Anti-Weaponization Fund and then he pulled back on his threat to launch the “biggest attack since World War II” on Iran in favor of peace talks, though Tehran said talks weren’t happening (they were).

The setbacks raise questions about how much leverage Mr. Trump has with lawmakers and the American public ahead of November’s midterm elections. If Republicans lose control of Congress, Mr. Trump’s agenda would stall, and his administration would be buried in an avalanche of Democrat-led congressional probes.

The White House dismissed the recent hard times as an aberration that will be forgotten come November. Officials point to the slate of socialist candidates nominated by Democrats and Mr. Trump’s efforts to lower costs as reasons to be optimistic come November.

Most of the savings claimed by Mr. Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency, formerly led by Elon Musk, never actually came to pass.

A new audit by the Government Accountability Office, Congress’ chief investigative agency, said DOGE took credit for cuts already in the pipeline, exaggerated some claims and couldn’t provide evidence for others.

All told, of the $110.3 billion DOGE claimed to have saved, GAO said it could only find solid support for 4% of those claims.

In one case, DOGE said it had gotten the Defense Department’s health agency to nix a $1.7 billion technology contract, but GAO investigators said the contract was never cut or reduced.

Congressional Democrats, who requested the report, said it confirmed their fears.

“Everyone supports rooting out waste, fraud and abuse in the federal government, but DOGE was a slapdash and deceptive effort that misled the American people while doing real damage to the government’s ability to serve them,” said Sen. Gary Peters, Michigan Democrat.

On Capitol Hill

Dr. Anthony Fauci appears before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee at the Capitol, Wednesday, July 29, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Allison Robbert)

Fallout for Dr. Fauci. A Senate committee voted to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress for refusing to answer senators’ questions about his decisions and actions during the pandemic.

The 8-5 party-line vote sends the matter to the full Senate, where it could face a Democrat-led filibuster.

Republicans said the vote was necessary to defend congressional authority to get answers from unwilling witnesses — and in particular Dr. Fauci, who led the country’s efforts to combat the coronavirus.

“On behalf of the millions of people harmed by Anthony Fauci, resoundingly yes,” said Sen. Bernie Moreno, Ohio Republican, when it was his turn to vote on the contempt resolution.

Dr. Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination more than 100 times before the committee about whether the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which he helmed for decades, had funded risky research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. That lab is at the center of suspicion over the origin of the coronavirus.

Sen. Rand Paul, Kentucky Republican and the committee chair, has pursued Dr. Fauci for years to get those answers.

Staring down Social Security’s looming insolvency, senators learned they lack agreement on just about everything.

The Social Security Trust Fund will be depleted in about six years. After that, everyone receiving benefits would take a cut of about 22% if Congress does nothing between now and then. That would be an average cut of about $500 per month per recipient.

GOP senators favor a bipartisan commission to talk the ideas through and bring back recommendations for Congress to bless.

But many Democrats said a commission seems like a roundabout scheme to force benefit cuts onto America’s seniors. They say the answer is tax increases, particularly on the rich, to patch the troubled program.

Sen. Mike Crapo, the Idaho Republican who chairs the Senate Finance Committee and who called the hearing, said Republicans have plans — some of them worked on with Democrats — but they should be hashed out in a commission.

He said Congress has had decades to act but has failed, so it needs a commission to shape the solutions and create the “pressure” for lawmakers to act.

All sides agreed on the mix of potential solutions: increase revenue, slow the growth of benefit increases, remove wealthier people from the rolls, and delay the age when people can start collecting.

Charles Blahous, a former Social Security trustee, said the problem is now so big that no single proposal will work — unless lawmakers are prepared for the ramifications of crippling tax increases or a 30% cut in future payments.

The House Committee on Ethics recommended Rep. Chuck Edwards be censured after the panel found he violated the chamber’s Code of Official Conduct through a sustained pattern of inappropriate, unprofessional behavior toward two young female staffers.

The committee’s action prompted Mr. Edwards, North Carolina Republican, to announce that he will not seek reelection.

North Carolina law allows the 11th Congressional District Republican Executive Committee to select a replacement for Mr. Edwards, but no new primary election will be held.

In the courts

Gun silencers are on display at the Sig Sauer booth at the Shooting, Hunting and Outdoor Trade Show in Las Vegas, Jan. 19, 2016. (AP Photo/John Locher, File)

Wins for gun owners. A federal judge ruled that a large part of the National Firearms Act is now unconstitutional, in a decision that could erase registration requirements for sales or transfer of silencers and short-barreled long guns.

Judge James Wesley Hendrix, a Trump appointee to the bench in Texas, said when Congress zeroed out a tax on those weapons and accessories last year, it erased the constitutional underpinnings for the paperwork and registration requirements that were part of the 1934 gun law.

Lawmakers said they needed the registrations to carry out the tax. But Judge Hendrix said no tax means no more registration.

He limited his ruling to the plaintiffs in two cases before him, and to their members and customers. But the plaintiffs include major gun-rights groups, whose membership includes millions of gun owners and some firearms manufacturers, retailers and importers.

Fifteen GOP-led states were also plaintiffs, and their agencies and subdivisions would also get relief from the registration requirements.

Judge Hendrix put a seven-day hold on his ruling taking effect, to allow time for an appeal.

Foster parents don’t cede their Second Amendment rights, a Wisconsin appeals court has ruled.

The case involved Brian and Katie Lafferty, who clashed with Wisconsin’s Department of Children and Families and a local county human services department. The officials had argued the parents signed away their gun rights when they applied to foster youths.

The three-judge panel said that was wrong.

“We conclude the Laffertys did not waive their constitutional rights by volunteering to serve as foster parents,” wrote Judge Maria Lazar.

The county had initially imposed demands that those seeking to be licensed as foster families with concealed-carry permits could not carry their guns when in the presence of foster children; must store their guns behind two locks, with ammunition kept in a separate place; and must disclose all of their firearms and their locations to the county.

In our opinion

Sen. John Fetterman and political party affiliation illustration by Alexander Hunter/The Washington Times

If John Fetterman, Pennsylvania Democrat, wants to stay in the Senate, he must change his party affiliation to independent, argues Commentary Editor Kelly Sadler.

Joseph Curl writes that Mr. Trump’s lies caught up with him in the Reflecting Pool case.

Mr. Mamdani is spouting rhetoric that echoes the past pattern of dehumanizing Jews, writes Gerard Leval.

Thanks for reading On Background from Susan Ferrechio and Dave Boyer. If this newsletter was shared with you, sign up here to receive it each Friday morning.

Have questions for Susan or Dave? Send them an email at sferrechio@washingtontimes.com or dboyer@washingtontimes.com.