Plotting to pack. Perhaps putting their cart before the midterm horse, Democrats are plotting to control the third branch of government by forcing conservative Supreme Court justices off the bench and diluting their vote by packing the court.
Party leaders are watching poll numbers that show the majority of Democrats are fed up with the Supreme Court and favor imposing term limits or adding justices.
“We have to do [something] with the Supreme Court, that is now a rogue Supreme Court,” former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, a likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, told attendees at the Rainbow PUSH Coalition convention.
With six Republican-nominated justices and three from Democratic presidents, the high court infuriated Democrats with a string of rulings, among them the 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark ruling that established a constitutional right to abortion. The court also handed down a presidential immunity ruling that protected Mr. Trump from prosecution and, most recently, tossed out parts of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, paving the way for Republicans to redraw congressional maps ahead of the November midterm elections.
Democrats accuse the high court of “legislating from the bench,” and the decisions are not going their way.
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of an occasional marijuana user, saying the government went too far in prosecuting him as a habitual drug addict who faces a lifetime ban on possessing a gun.
The unanimous ruling said as much about relaxing attitudes toward marijuana as it did about gun rights, with the justices comparing modern pot use to the use of alcohol at the nation’s founding.
Justices across the ideological spectrum said it was a stretch for prosecutors to argue that someone who used marijuana a few times a week and kept a firearm at home ostensibly for personal defense was enough of a danger to the community to justify a potential 15-year prison sentence.
The ruling could upend some past cases of others convicted of gun possession by illegal drug users.
Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman filed three lawsuits against companies operating sweepstakes casinos and prediction markets, accusing them of offering gambling products to Kentuckians while skirting state licensing, taxes and consumer protections.
The move thrusts the home of the Kentucky Derby — and a state whose gambling laws have long been shaped by the racing industry — into the national fight over who regulates prediction markets, putting the Trump administration at odds with a Republican-leaning state.
It also answers a lawsuit filed last week by a coalition of prediction market companies challenging Kentucky’s new 14.25% tax on their transaction fees.
Mr. Coleman’s office is targeting prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket, along with VGW and its sweepstakes casino platforms — Chumba Casino, Global Poker and LuckyLand Slots — in three circuit-court filings.
Prediction markets let customers buy and sell event contracts, a type of derivative tied to real-world outcomes such as elections or economic indicators.
The state argues the platforms are simply unlicensed gambling operations.