Skip to content
Advertisement

The Washington Times

Welcome to On Background, the politics newsletter that brings you insights from Capitol Hill to the campaign trail from veteran journalists at The Washington Times.

If this newsletter has been shared with you, click here to sign up to receive On Background from Dave Boyer and Susan Ferrechio every Friday morning.

The war with Iran is over. Now come the questions about the fine print.

President Trump offered an upbeat assessment of the peace agreement before Americans finally got to see it. He said the deal postpones Iran’s nuclear weapons ambitions and averts the “economic catastrophe” that would have occurred if the bombing had lasted another few weeks.

With the agreement signed, the U.S. will stop its blockade of Iranian ports, and Tehran will allow freedom of navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, a key channel for oil shipping.

Both sides now have 60 days to make a final deal to resolve the conflict that began on Feb. 28.

It’s not clear how the U.S. will enforce its goal of ensuring Tehran remains free of nuclear weapons. The U.S. agreed to lift sanctions on Iran and allow it to sell its oil. Iran will also receive at least $300 billion to rebuild, although Mr. Trump has vowed that no U.S. taxpayer money will be involved.

Closer to home, one immediate result of the agreement was that gas prices dropped below the national average of $4 per gallon for the first time since the war began.

Some Republicans and some in Mr. Trump’s MAGA base are expressing disgust with the deal, believing the U.S. got less out of the bargain than Iran.

“Before the war, the strait was open, Iran was being crushed by sanctions, and 13 service members were still alive,” said Sen. Bill Cassidy, Louisiana Republican whose career in Congress was cut short by Mr. Trump. “Now, 13 Americans are dead, families have paid billions at the pump, sanctions will be lifted, and the bombing has stopped. This is the worst foreign policy blunder in decades.”

There is other fallout from the war. Mr. Trump has invoked the Cold War-era Defense Production Act to spur the production of more munitions, stockpiles of which have dwindled during the war and from years of heavy American military aid to allies such as Ukraine and Israel.

And Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told NATO leaders that the Pentagon is launching a six-month review of U.S. force posture and basing in Europe designed to ensure that America’s allies eventually take the lead role in their own defense.

He lambasted alliance members who refused to support the U.S. in its military operations against Iran.

“This will be a real review,” Mr. Hegseth said. “It will be designed to ensure that NATO is moving fast and irreversibly toward Europe leading [and] stepping up to take primary responsibility for the defense of Europe.”

In the Trump administration

Pedestrians walk past a sign in Evanston, Ill., Friday, April 30, 2021. The Chicago suburb is preparing to pay reparations in the form of housing grants to Black residents who experienced housing discrimination. The city is being hailed as the first to do so, and is being held up as a model in its approach for other cities looking to do the same. (AP Photo/Shafkat Anowar)

Reversing reparations. The Trump Justice Department is suing Evanston, Illinois, to stop a first-of-its-kind reparations program that has handed out more than $5 million to about 600 Black residents who said they were hurt by housing discrimination.

The suburb of Chicago has begun paying residents who say they or their ancestors were victims of the city’s discriminatory zoning ordinances from 1919 until 1969.

Advocates hope to extend such programs to other cities, saying the vestiges of slavery and discrimination have resulted in a “wealth gap” and other residual harm to Black Americans.

The DOJ’s lawsuit could end the national reparations movement, marking a reversal from the Biden administration, which supported studying reparations and focused its Civil Rights Division and other departments on diversity, equity and inclusion.

The Education Department, what’s left of it, is moving oversight of special education services and civil rights out of the agency to other parts of the government as part of the Trump administration’s effort to shutter the department.

The Justice Department will now handle civil rights enforcement and student privacy protection, while the Department of Health and Human Services takes over special education initiatives for students with disabilities.

“The Trump administration has been clear: as we scale back federal micromanaging when it hinders success, we are equally committed to bolstering the efficiency of federal oversight where it is essential,” Education Secretary Linda McMahon said.

She said moving civil rights enforcement to the Justice Department will ensure a stronger, more coordinated effort and “robust protection for student privacy.”

The Education Department’s Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services and its Office for Civil Rights handle some of the department’s most sensitive cases, including complaints that students have been discriminated against based on their race, national origin, gender or disability status.

On Capitol Hill

Jay Clayton, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, listens during a news conference in New York, March 9, 2026. (AP Photo/Seth Wenig) ** FILE **

Same team? Mr. Trump forced Senate Republicans to postpone a confirmation hearing for Director of National Intelligence nominee Jay Clayton and demanded that they instead approve his long-sought election integrity bill along with the reauthorization of a key spy law.

The president said Republicans “fell into a trap” set by Democrats when they agreed to speed through Mr. Clayton’s confirmation without getting anything in return.

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton, Arkansas Republican, called the president’s move “regrettable.” The action ensures that Trump loyalist William J. Pulte will take over as acting DNI as planned.

It’s the latest clash between the president and Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota over issues such as the Secure America Act, ending the filibuster and halting the Senate “blue slip” tradition of senators blocking undesirable nominees in their home states.

Republicans have chosen Dallas for September’s first-of-its-kind midterm convention, according to Senate candidate Ken Paxton.

Mr. Paxton, the Texas attorney general who is the Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate, told listeners in a Monday tele-town hall that the Republican National Committee picked Dallas for the convention ahead of the November elections.

He also said Mr. Trump is expected to speak at the event.

Republicans have been planning the unusual midterm convention for several months, hoping it will boost voter turnout and enthusiasm.

In the courts

The U.S. Supreme Court is seen Thursday, June 11, 2026, in Washington. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)

Plotting to pack. Perhaps putting their cart before the midterm horse, Democrats are plotting to control the third branch of government by forcing conservative Supreme Court justices off the bench and diluting their vote by packing the court.

Party leaders are watching poll numbers that show the majority of Democrats are fed up with the Supreme Court and favor imposing term limits or adding justices.

“We have to do [something] with the Supreme Court, that is now a rogue Supreme Court,” former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, a likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, told attendees at the Rainbow PUSH Coalition convention.

With six Republican-nominated justices and three from Democratic presidents, the high court infuriated Democrats with a string of rulings, among them the 2022 decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark ruling that established a constitutional right to abortion. The court also handed down a presidential immunity ruling that protected Mr. Trump from prosecution and, most recently, tossed out parts of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, paving the way for Republicans to redraw congressional maps ahead of the November midterm elections.

Democrats accuse the high court of “legislating from the bench,” and the decisions are not going their way.

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of an occasional marijuana user, saying the government went too far in prosecuting him as a habitual drug addict who faces a lifetime ban on possessing a gun.

The unanimous ruling said as much about relaxing attitudes toward marijuana as it did about gun rights, with the justices comparing modern pot use to the use of alcohol at the nation’s founding.

Justices across the ideological spectrum said it was a stretch for prosecutors to argue that someone who used marijuana a few times a week and kept a firearm at home ostensibly for personal defense was enough of a danger to the community to justify a potential 15-year prison sentence.

The ruling could upend some past cases of others convicted of gun possession by illegal drug users.

Kentucky Attorney General Russell Coleman filed three lawsuits against companies operating sweepstakes casinos and prediction markets, accusing them of offering gambling products to Kentuckians while skirting state licensing, taxes and consumer protections.

The move thrusts the home of the Kentucky Derby — and a state whose gambling laws have long been shaped by the racing industry — into the national fight over who regulates prediction markets, putting the Trump administration at odds with a Republican-leaning state.

It also answers a lawsuit filed last week by a coalition of prediction market companies challenging Kentucky’s new 14.25% tax on their transaction fees.

Mr. Coleman’s office is targeting prediction markets Kalshi and Polymarket, along with VGW and its sweepstakes casino platforms — Chumba Casino, Global Poker and LuckyLand Slots — in three circuit-court filings.

Prediction markets let customers buy and sell event contracts, a type of derivative tied to real-world outcomes such as elections or economic indicators.

The state argues the platforms are simply unlicensed gambling operations.

In our opinion

Midterm elections in the United States of America illustration by Linas Garsys / The Washington Times

Michael McKenna predicts there will not be a blue wave in the midterms, thanks to the Democrats’ inability to run “a more normal set of candidates.”

Jed Babbin argues that turning Mr. Trump’s distrust of the intelligence community into a healthy skepticism would benefit the nation in the last two years of his presidency.

The Bidens are doing themselves a disservice with their current media blitz trying to salvage Joe Biden’s legacy, writes Joseph Curl.

Thanks for reading On Background from Susan Ferrechio and Dave Boyer. If this newsletter was shared with you, sign up here to receive it each Friday morning.

Have questions for Susan or Dave? Send them an email at sferrechio@washingtontimes.com or dboyer@washingtontimes.com.