Skip to content

The Washington Times

Welcome to On Background, the politics newsletter that brings you insights from Capitol Hill to the campaign trail from veteran journalists at The Washington Times.

If this newsletter has been shared with you, click here to sign up to receive On Background from Dave Boyer and Susan Ferrechio every Friday morning.

The Supreme Court has issued landmark decisions in recent years on issues ranging from gun rights to abortion, and Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. has been at the heart of the court’s influential conservative majority.

Justice Alito, in an hour-long interview with Washington Times reporters Stephen Dinan and Alex Swoyer, spoke of the campaign to intimidate the justices with “threatening” protests at their homes and his chagrin that neither the Biden Justice Department nor local prosecutors did much of anything about it.

“I think there has been a campaign to try to intimidate the court and some of the justices because of displeasure with some of our decisions. And if the campaign to intimidate us and affect our votes does not succeed, the next objective is to discredit the court as a whole or at least some of the justices,” he said.

“I think it’s alarming. I think it contributes to a decline in public respect for the court and can ultimately have a serious effect on our standing.”

Justice Alito was particularly troubled by unruly protests in 2022, after the leak of his draft opinion in the Dobbs case that would eventually overturn Roe v. Wade and erase a national right to abortion.

“It is illegal under federal law to try to influence a judge’s decision by improper means. Putting pressure or intimidation by having a threatening protest outside a judge’s house — one can certainly argue it falls under the federal statute,” he said.

He said state laws in Maryland and Virginia, where the justices live, also could have been used, but weren’t.

“Nothing was done under the federal statute and the local prosecutors in Montgomery County, where some of the justices live, and Fairfax County, where others of the justices live, did nothing,” he said.

Justice Alito also chided some news organizations for invasive coverage of the justices — such as The New York Times’ report this month covering floating kayak protests outside Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.’s summer vacation home in Maine.

“There have been stories that unnecessarily invade justices’ privacy. I thought that was the case with the NYT story about the chief justice’s vacation,” Justice Alito said.

“There has been unfair reporting in some instances, and very disparate treatment of justices. [Justice] Clarence Thomas and I have been subjected to a degree of scrutiny that goes far beyond what was experienced by some of my colleagues,” he said.

Artificial intelligence has made its way into the courts, cropping up in the form of phony case citations, but Justice Alito said neither he nor his law clerks use AI in their work.

He also said he’s still on the fence when it comes to the big question of the likelihood of the AI doomsday scenario, where rogue agents bring about the death of humanity.

“I’m waiting to find the answer. I don’t really know. Its capabilities appear to be pretty formidable,” he told The Times during an interview in his office at the court ahead of publication of his new book, “So Ordered: An Originalist’s View of the Constitution, the Court and our Country.”

“I certainly haven’t used it for any court work. I haven’t surveyed my colleagues, I’m pretty sure they haven’t, and our clerks haven’t,” he said.

As for intimidation, the Justice Department says it won’t tolerate harassment of federal judges.

“While the Department does not confirm or deny the existence of investigations, under President Trump we treat threats and intimidation against federal judges, including the justices of the Supreme Court, with the utmost seriousness. Those who threaten or intimidate judges will be held accountable,” a DOJ spokesperson told The Times.

In the Trump administration

A member of the West Virginia National Guard gazes up at the Lincoln Memorial on the National Mall in Washington, as part of President Donald Trump's order to use federal law enforcement to expel homeless people and rid the nation's capital of violent crime, Monday, Aug. 25, 2025. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite) **FILE**

Lack of credit is a crime in itself. When it comes to the plummeting national crime rate, Mr. Trump is a victim of his own success.

On Mr. Trump’s watch, violent crime has plunged to some of its lowest levels in modern history, allowing voters and candidates to move on to other problems. As a result, Mr. Trump is not getting credit for tackling what had been one of the country’s biggest concerns.

Murders, robberies and other violent offenses have fallen sharply, while arrests of violent offenders, gang members and fugitives have surged.

FBI data shared with The Washington Times shows a dramatic shift during Mr. Trump’s first 20 months in office compared to the end of 2024, which was President Biden’s final year in the Oval Office:

The homicide rate has dropped roughly 20%, and violent crime fell 9.3% in 2025, the largest one-year decline since the bureau began estimating national crime trends in 1936. Robberies fell 18.5%, and aggravated assaults declined 7.2%

Even in Chicago, a city Mr. Trump uses to paint Democrats as soft on crime, violence is down. Chicago recorded 416 murders last year, a 29% decrease from 2024 and its fewest since 1965, according to the data the city’s police department provides to the FBI.

Shootings in Chicago dropped to 1,471 incidents, a 35% decrease from 2024.

As the numbers recede, so does crime’s place in the political spotlight. When the Pew Research Center asked voters to identify their most important issue for the midterm elections, less than 4% said crime, keeping it out of the top 10.

Oklahoma City-based pollster Pat McFerron said he’s not even polling on the issue of crime because it has dropped from voters’ consciousness.

“Crime has been replaced with affordability,” he said. “Crime got solved, and we’re a society that worries more about what our problems are than applauding the good things that have happened. No politician ever gets credit for the issue they solve. A new issue just takes its place.”

Mr. Trump is still promising to send a $5,000 “dividend” to every U.S. adult citizen if Republicans win the midterms, saying he will pay for the checks by tapping into surging investment in U.S. manufacturing.

Speaking of numbers, a number approaching zero is how many people outside 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue believe the checks will arrive.

The idea, which would cost the federal government roughly $1.22 trillion based on $5,000 checks for 245 million adults, is drawing scrutiny. Trump has described the cost as “approximately $1 trillion.”

Mr. Trump’s claim of foreign investment is nearly double the $11.2 trillion listed on the White House website and appears to conflate private-industry commitments with Treasury revenue that can be redistributed as government checks to Americans.

“Those are private-sector investments that will generate private-sector income, which could be taxed and used to pay bills. But there’s no direct flow of cash to the Treasury,” said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former director of the Congressional Budget Office and the current president of the American Action Forum, a center-right nonprofit.

The Department of Homeland Security wants to impose a $70,000 initial fee on foreign students seeking work in the U.S. to discourage companies from relying on them for cheap labor.

The department said the Optional Practical Training program has become so rife with fraud that investigators can’t police it anymore. The announcement came as the Labor Department announced sweeping new punishments against tech companies and other employers for laying off American workers and replacing them with lower-paid foreign guest workers.

Without the additional money, Homeland Security said it might shut down the OPT program altogether.

“Optional Practical Training was never meant to be a back door into the American workforce, a subsidy for cheap labor, or a prize for those who game the system,” the department said in announcing the proposal.

OPT has exploded in popularity after changes made by the Obama administration, to the point that Homeland Security says it has become a threat to U.S. workers, particularly in science, technology and engineering jobs.

In 2024, more than 165,000 foreign students were working in those fields under OPT, or nearly double the number of foreigners admitted under the more traditional H-1B guest-worker visa.

Three more noncitizen voting cases in Louisiana were brought to light by the Justice Department.

They include a Cuban man, a Mexican woman and a Nicaraguan man, all legal permanent residents whom authorities said registered to vote and cast ballots in 2024. Under federal law, only citizens are eligible to vote in national elections.

The cases are part of a new focus by the Justice Department to expose and charge noncitizen voting.

In addition to the three Louisiana cases, the Justice Department highlighted 10 other cases in Minnesota, two in Florida and one in Wisconsin, which had been previously announced by U.S. attorneys in those states.

All of those charged are described as legal permanent residents, meaning they have legal status but did not reach full citizenship, which is a requirement under federal law for voting in a congressional or presidential election.

Fifteen were charged with illegally voting in the 2024 presidential election, and one was charged with voting in 2022, the last midterm congressional election.

The Justice Department under the Biden administration brought 13 such cases over its four-year term.

On the campaign trail

Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers speaks at the Republican convention Thursday, Sept. 10, 2026, in Dallas. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)

Separation anxiety. Michigan’s Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers denounced the trade war with Canada in a new ad in which he distances himself from Mr. Trump.

Mr. Rogers doesn’t mention the president by name in the ad, but signals his opposition to the administration’s adversarial treatment of Canada.

“Here in Michigan, we know that Canada is not our enemy. We need to end this tariff war now,” Mr. Rogers says in the ad after praising Labatt, a Canadian beer. “As Michigan’s senator, I’ll bring both parties together to lower your prices.”

Other Republican Senate candidates such as Sen. Susan Collins in Maine and John E. Sununu in New Hampshire have declared their opposition to the president’s tariffs, which they say will harm their state’s economies.

The ad comes after Mr. Rogers called for an end to the Iran war and for state and federal lawmakers to suspend fuel taxes.

Michigan helped elect Mr. Trump as president in 2016 and 2024, but has not elected a Republican to the Senate in more than 30 years.

Senate Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer is reporting Mr. Trump to the Federal Election Commission for illegally coordinating with the super PAC MAGA Inc.

Mr. Trump said he is halting a taxpayer-funded ad campaign that he says promotes the country and will pay for the ads through the super PAC.

“Trump has gutted funding for health care and other essential programs but he nonetheless found millions of dollars — taxpayer dollars — to pay for political ads,” the New York Democrat said in a statement. “This is illegal, corrupt and undemocratic — and now he’s following with another illegal act by directing his Super PAC to pick up the tab for his propaganda.”

Because Super PACs can raise funds without contribution limits, they are barred from coordinating with candidates on spending decisions such as ad buys.

Mr. Trump said he planned to switch the source of the funding for the recent ads he has been running, which have cost at least $1.5 million in federal funding. The spots tout the state of the country under his leadership and warn against socialists taking control.

In our opinion

Donald Trump, the 47th president of the United States illustration by Greg Groesch / The Washington Times

The Washington Times Editorial Board argues that Mr. Trump’s setbacks are temporary, while his successes will pay off long term.

Joseph Curl examines the rise of the “double haters.”

Stephen Moore alerts both Democratic and Republican lawmakers that price caps don’t work.

Thanks for reading On Background from Susan Ferrechio and Dave Boyer. If this newsletter was shared with you, sign up here to receive it each Friday morning.

Have questions for Susan or Dave? Send them an email at sferrechio@washingtontimes.com or dboyer@washingtontimes.com.