Skip to content

The Washington Times

Welcome to On Background, the politics newsletter that brings you insights from Capitol Hill to the campaign trail from veteran journalists at The Washington Times.

If this newsletter has been shared with you, click here to sign up to receive On Background from Dave Boyer and Susan Ferrechio every Friday morning.

With the midterm election campaign entering its final days, the eyes of the nation are turning — as they almost never do — to the great state of Alaska.

Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy ordered an investigation into whether the campaign of Democratic Senate candidate Mary Peltola violated state laws or should face criminal charges or civil action for allegedly recruiting an outside contender with the same name as the Republican incumbent.

The probe follows a report alleging that operatives connected to Ms. Peltola’s campaign and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee helped recruit a retired teacher named Dan J. Sullivan Jr. to enter the U.S. Senate race against incumbent GOP Sen. Dan S. Sullivan. The idea, of course, is to split the GOP vote and hand the election to Ms. Peltola.

The governor said this tactic is meant to “deliberately confuse voters and misdirect their votes.”

“I am therefore directing the Department of Public Safety to investigate whether this scheme violated Alaska’s laws and whether criminal charges or civil action are warranted. The evidence will determine what happens next,” said Mr. Dunleavy, a Republican.

The New York Times reported that the “ballot composition project” began in the summer of 2025 and led to the recruitment of Dan J. Sullivan. He says with a straight face that he came up with the idea all by himself.

Ms. Peltola’s campaign and the DSCC are shocked — shocked! — that anyone would accuse them of dirty tricks.

“The Alaskans for Mary campaign has no involvement with either Sullivan campaign and did not recruit any candidates into the race,” the campaign said.

President Trump, whose quality of life would nosedive over the next two years if Democrats capture the Senate, is already convinced of a scam and called for Ms. Peltola to be removed from the ballot. That won’t happen.

This 11th-hour drama in the farthest reaches of the republic underscores how much is at stake for Mr. Trump in the midterms, and how he’s scrambling to extinguish anti-Trump brushfires across the election map.

From Alaska to Texas to Maine, Mr. Trump and the GOP are fighting an uphill battle against traditional voter unrest in midterm elections and fresh cost-of-living anxiety fueled largely by Mr. Trump’s war of choice in Iran.

Republicans got some good economic news this week on two fronts. U.S. economic growth accelerated over the summer, the federal Bureau of Economic Analysis said in a report showing consumer spending remains strong despite inflation grumbles. Gross domestic product, a broad measure of goods and services in the country, grew 3.4% in the quarter spanning June, July and August, up from 2.2% during the spring quarter.

Businesses are investing in the artificial intelligence sector, and consumer spending increased 3.8%, making them twin contributors to growth.

Also, the Federal Reserve decided to keep interest rates steady, mollifying investors and holding the line on the cost of borrowing until at least December.

In his tireless barnstorming for Republicans, the octogenarian Mr. Trump says he’s done everything possible to lower costs for consumers. He’s pointing to his success in negotiating lower prescription drug prices as a huge win that, by itself, should propel Republicans to victory.

Many voters will not know whether they are benefiting from the discounts, however, and overall inflation and foreign wars have overshadowed the issue, creating a mismatch between Mr. Trump’s hopes and campaign realities.

“It’s eclipsed by Iran, tariffs — all the other aspects of the affordability concerns,” said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a former director of the Congressional Budget Office and the current president of the American Action Forum, a center-right nonprofit.

You might be shocked — shocked! — to learn that Democrats plan to massively boost government spending on Obamacare subsidies if they win control of Congress.

The plan, which could cost as much as $350 billion, is one of the few concrete legislative proposals Democrats have offered as they campaign to lower the cost of living.

“We’re going to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits, which will help make health insurance premiums more affordable for over 20 million Americans directly and tens of millions more whose premiums have increased indirectly, even if they may be on private insurance,” said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, New York Democrat.

Also, Democrats could capture a majority of the nation’s governorships for the first time since 2010. Republicans hold 26 governorships compared with 24 for Democrats.

With 36 governorships on the ballot, Democrats hope to flip Republican strongholds in Ohio, Iowa and Georgia while holding the top state spots in politically divided Wisconsin, Arizona and Michigan.

That would give Democrats a larger platform to challenge Mr. Trump’s policies and strengthen their position ahead of the 2028 presidential election.

It would also be critical for Democrats as they prepare for upcoming redistricting fights, battles over election integrity, abortion restrictions and immigration enforcement.

In the Trump administration

Voters cast their ballots during the primary election in Windsor, Conn., Aug. 11, 2026. (AP Photo/Rusty Jones, File)

Vote much? A Washington Times analysis shows that illegal voting, which happens far more often than liberals admit, is usually a result of a lack of oversight by state and local election officials instead of a widespread nefarious plot.

That said, illegal voters are more than twice as likely to be registered Democrats than Republicans, according to the cases where party affiliation can be determined. The Justice Department this fall has embarked on a campaign of prosecutions against those who’ve voted illegally.

For many, their voter registration was a mistake made by someone at a government agency or a registration drive outside a grocery store urged them to register.

Others were deliberate but mistaken about the rules, saying they figured that as long-time immigrants, even if they’d never attained citizenship, they’d still earned the right to vote.

Once they are on the rolls, state election officials usually don’t do anything to verify eligibility.

The Times didn’t find any broad conspiracy to actively seek out noncitizens. Instead, the records showed an indifference, bordering on negligence, that allowed them to register and didn’t stop them from voting.

A hacking group leaked the files of more than 41,000 Department of Homeland Security personnel online, exposing names, contact information and assignments.

The transparency nonprofit Distributed Denial of Secrets published a massive database containing records after a group known as the Department of Peace harvested data from the department’s sign-on service.

“On July 17th, [Homeland Security Secretary] Markwayne Mullin said he was ‘turning up the heat.’ This is what happens to ICE when you do that,” a spokesperson for the Department of Peace said in a statement.

The leak includes agents, operatives, associates and those involved in undercover operations.

Contact information compromised includes phone numbers and email addresses of employees from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Customs and Border Protection, Homeland Security Investigations, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and other component agencies.

A Homeland Security spokesperson said the agency is “aware of a potential breach and is actively working to address the situation swiftly and effectively.”

Former FBI Director James B. Comey has been criminally charged for the third time by the Justice Department, this time on accusations that he leaked a sensitive national security document.

Few details were available in the court filing, but Mr. Comey is accused of leaking the document when he was the FBI director in October 2016.

The charges were filed against Mr. Comey in the District of Columbia on Oct. 5, a decade after the alleged distribution of the document.

The former FBI chief, who was fired by Mr. Trump in May 2017, professed his innocence in a video posted Monday.

“Nothing’s changed with me. I’m still innocent. I’m still not afraid of these people, and I still believe in the independent federal judiciary,” he said.

On the campaign trail

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, boards Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews, Md., Wednesday, Oct. 7, 2026. (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)

Ted talk. Sen. Ted Cruz is spending the closing days of the midterm campaigns in some familiar political territory: battleground states and — wait for it — early presidential primary states.

Mr. Cruz is campaigning for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, the GOP Senate nominee, but he’s also crisscrossing the country on behalf of Senate candidates in Iowa, Kansas, Michigan and South Carolina.

It was his third visit in recent months to Iowa, which just happens to have an outsized role in presidential politics as the traditional launching pad for the GOP nominating contest.

Republican strategist Ford O’Connell said the itinerary looks less like a midterm sprint and more like the opening stages of a potential 2028 presidential campaign.

“He would like to run for president, and hence you do this because all eyes are on these battleground races the next few days, and then the second the midterms are over, the 2028 conversation begins,” Mr. O’Connell said. “This is to make sure you are being seen, because we are going to turn, literally 48 hours after the midterms, to the 2028 talk.”

Mr. Trump, who has talked about a 2028 ticket of Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio succeeding him, is floating Mr. Cruz instead as a potential Supreme Court nominee if a vacancy opens up.

The president said it would be an easy confirmation battle because his fellow senators want to get rid of him.

“I would pick Ted Cruz to be the next Supreme Court justice,” Mr. Trump said in Lubbock, Texas. “Wouldn’t even have to make a phone call. The Democrats will 100% vote for it because they hate the guy and want to get rid of him. The Republicans would 100% vote for it because they can’t stand him. They would like to get rid of him. So I’d get 100% of the vote, and he would be a Supreme Court justice and he’d do a great job.”

In the courts

FILE - Ballots are inspected the day after California's primary election at the Los Angeles County Ballot Processing Center, June 3, 2026, in City of Industry, Calif. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong, File)

California’s noncitizens. In non-economic election jockeying, the Trump administration lost a court ruling when a federal judge rebuffed the administration’s demand that California sequester 20,000 ballots from registered voters the feds say are likely noncitizens.

Judge David Carter, a Clinton appointee to the bench in California, said the Justice Department can bring charges against voters later, but cannot stop them beforehand. He said the Trump team’s request was unprecedented and trampled on the state’s ability to run its own election.

“Constitutional rights and our democracy are at stake,” the judge wrote. “The public interest favors their protection. Individuals who have met the requirements of California’s voter registration laws must not be deprived of a core right merely because of unfounded allegations stemming from a procedure rife with uncertainty and errors.”

The Justice Department broke the law when it summarily fired Maurene Comey, daughter of the former FBI director and prominent anti-Trump figure, a federal judge ruled, ordering that she be reinstated to her high-level prosecutor’s post and given back pay.

Judge Jesse Furman, an Obama appointee to the court in New York, said Ms. Comey had been a well-respected prosecutor before her firing in July 2025.

He said the Justice Department’s reasons for the firing rang thin and defied federal law, which only allowed firings of assistant U.S. attorneys in very limited instances, which Ms. Comey’s case didn’t meet.

“Comey’s removal was not authorized by any statute,” the judge wrote.

The Justice Department had argued that even if her firing ran against the law, recent Supreme Court rulings have recognized expansive firing powers for a president.

In his ruling, he declared that Ms. Comey’s firing violated the Administrative Procedure Act, which requires that agency decision-making be fair and thoughtful; it trampled on the separation of powers by trying to circumvent the laws Congress wrote to govern the firing of civil employees; and it denied Ms. Comey her Fifth Amendment due process rights.

A federal appeals court rebuffed the Justice Department’s request to delay having to review and release foreign language material from the Epstein files.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia said there was little harm to the government in carrying out the review.

The court said a document release should be made public under the Epstein Files Transparency Act that Mr. Trump signed into law last year.

“In particular, the government has failed to show that it is irreparably harmed by merely initiating review of foreign-language documents under the Epstein Files Transparency Act,” the panel said in an unsigned opinion. All three judges were Democratic appointees.

They said release of the files isn’t imminent. That could give the administration more time to argue against it.

Attorney General Todd Blanche resisted any further review or release of the files, saying he believed his department has fulfilled its obligation under the law.

Katie Phang, who maintains a YouTube channel focused on Epstein documents, sued to force more disclosure, and a district judge agreed.

In our opinion

Iran's revolution illustration by Linas Garsys / The Washington Times

Former President Barack Obama is showing his ignorance of history when he calls the conflict with Iran “an unnecessary war,” writes Clifford D. May.

American voters are seething with anger to throw the bums out in this midterm election, and their fervor is bipartisan, says Joseph Curl.

The U.S. needs to reengage with North Korea if Washington is ever to achieve its ultimate goal of denuclearizing Pyongyang, writes Joseph R. DeTrani.

Thanks for reading On Background from Susan Ferrechio and Dave Boyer. If this newsletter was shared with you, sign up here to receive it each Friday morning.

Have questions for Susan or Dave? Send them an email at sferrechio@washingtontimes.com or dboyer@washingtontimes.com.